Cool.

I’d guess Justin’s issue was a Player trust file problem, and restarting Flash 
Builder would probably fix that.

On Jan 21, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote:

> It's just installed now :-)
> 
> The files have the same names as mentioned in the config files:
> 
> tchiverton@ev34:/tmp/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.0-bin$ find . -iname 
> 'textLayout*swf'
> ./frameworks/rsls/textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf
> tchiverton@ev34:/tmp/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.0-bin$ grep -Hrn 
> textLayout_4.14.0.20150119 *
> frameworks/air-config.xml:366: 
> <rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
> frameworks/flex-config.xml:370: 
> <rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
> ide/flashbuilder/config/flex-config.xml:370: 
> <rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
> ide/flashbuilder/config/air-config.xml:366: 
> <rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
> tchiverton@ev34:/tmp/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.0-bin$
> 
> And mxmlc prints out, for an RSL-enabled build of one of our apps:
> 
> Required RSLs:
>    ....
>   textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf
>    ....
> 
> The application trys to load the files from the names given by mxmlc, so it 
> works fine as long as you copy the RSLs as named.
> 
> Maybe Builder has an issue ? But looks OK to me,
> Tom
> 
> On 21/01/15 09:08, Harbs wrote:
>> Okay. Can you confirm that it’s broken?
>> 
>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 21/01/15 08:43, Harbs wrote:
>>>>  RSLs are turned off by default and they do not really offer any 
>>>> performance advantage using Apache Flex.
>>> It depends on your use case. If you update your app more often than SDKs, 
>>> you can give you users a smaller download after app updates, at the cost of 
>>> a larger first run size.
>>> 
>>> YMMV, but we use them, so if they don't work the SDK is broken for us.
>>> 
>>> Tom
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> 
> 

Reply via email to