On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
> This is true it is a bit edge case, only for externs based applications at
> the moment, it could become less true if want to use conditional
> compilation for framework components too IMO and let the creator build it
> in one shot, in 2 shots, he could still modify the generated JS to include
> the <inject_html> though.
>
> Btw,
> I had a look at the Closure Compiler Externs Extractor [1] but the
> result of the extracted lib [2] doesn't show any type annotations, I guess
> this is normal but I wonder how those google externs like this one [3] have
> been built ?
>
I already commented on this but [2] is useless for our case, it's only use
is to get you going with the existing API in the library.
[3] was built by hand, all externs in those directories are written by hand.
As far as the comments, I think that is a compiler flag Alex added.
Mike
>
> Another thing, why when I cross compile IStand, I don't have the comments
> generated like:
>
> /**
> * addBead()
> *
> * @expose
> * @param {org_apache_flex_core_IBead} bead The bead to add.
> */
>
> I've got that only:
>
> /**
> * org.apache.flex.core.IStrand
> *
> * @fileoverview
> *
> * @suppress {checkTypes}
> */
>
> goog.provide('org_apache_flex_core_IStrand');
>
> /**
> * @interface
> */
> org_apache_flex_core_IStrand = function() {
> };
> org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
> };
> org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
> function(classOrInterface) {
> };
> org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.removeBead = function(bead) {
> };
>
>
> /**
> * Metadata
> *
> * @type {Object.<string, Array.<Object>>}
> */
> org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
> name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>
> Thanks
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> [1] http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/Externs/
> [2] http://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.4.js
> [3]
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/closure-compiler/master/contrib/externs/angular-1.3.js
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:59:45 +0000
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/23/15, 10:03 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Yes, it's cool, it simplified my life as well as being able to modify the
> >>html head from AS, for example here with the dynamic loading of the
> >>jQuery lib but it seems I'm the only one happy with that :-)
> >>
> >>No interests to add such feature to the framework though ?
> >
> > I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
> > automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
> > org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in the
> > script being added to the head.
> >
> > This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or wrong.
> > Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
> > encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to guess
> > up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
>
>
