So, now, I guess those Core/js classes have been generated but how ? what's the
process ?
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:21:46 +0100
>
> Ok, sorry, I got it !!
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
>> have 1.9 in AS
>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:03:17 +0100
>>
>>> Try the -keep-asdoc flag on MXMLJSC.
>>
>> Actually, it is what I did, I tried to compile the asjs project Core/as to
>> js hoping to get the same result than what I can see in Core/js
>>
>> What it doesn't compiler the same ?
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
>>> now have 1.9 in AS
>>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:53:56 +0000
>>>
>>> Try the -keep-asdoc flag on MXMLJSC. But the deal is that none of these
>>> .as or .js files factor into the final app since they are all externs so
>>> <inject_html> won’t be seen.
>>>
>>> So yes, folks can use conditional compile to add stuff, but requiring a
>>> base class may be easier for the developers. Anyway, we’ll find out when
>>> more people use it.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 6/24/15, 10:12 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
>>>>> automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
>>>>> org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in the
>>>>> script being added to the head.
>>>>>
>>>>> This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or
>>>>>wrong.
>>>>> Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
>>>>> encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to guess
>>>>> up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This is true it is a bit edge case, only for externs based applications
>>>>at the moment, it could become less true if want to use conditional
>>>>compilation for framework components too IMO and let the creator build it
>>>>in one shot, in 2 shots, he could still modify the generated JS to
>>>>include the <inject_html> though.
>>>>
>>>>Btw,
>>>> I had a look at the Closure Compiler Externs Extractor [1] but the
>>>>result of the extracted lib [2] doesn't show any type annotations, I
>>>>guess this is normal but I wonder how those google externs like this one
>>>>[3] have been built ?
>>>>
>>>>Another thing, why when I cross compile IStand, I don't have the comments
>>>>generated like:
>>>>
>>>>/**
>>>> * addBead()
>>>> *
>>>> * @expose
>>>> * @param {org_apache_flex_core_IBead} bead The bead to add.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>>I've got that only:
>>>>
>>>>/**
>>>> * org.apache.flex.core.IStrand
>>>> *
>>>> * @fileoverview
>>>> *
>>>> * @suppress {checkTypes}
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>>goog.provide('org_apache_flex_core_IStrand');
>>>>
>>>>/**
>>>> * @interface
>>>> */
>>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand = function() {
>>>>};
>>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
>>>>};
>>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
>>>>function(classOrInterface) {
>>>>};
>>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.removeBead = function(bead) {
>>>>};
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>/**
>>>> * Metadata
>>>> *
>>>> * @type {Object.<string, Array.<Object>>}
>>>> */
>>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
>>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Frédéric THOMAS
>>>>
>>>>[1] http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/Externs/
>>>>[2] http://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.4.js
>>>>[3]
>>>>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/closure-compiler/master/contrib/e
>>>>xterns/angular-1.3.js
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----------------------------------------
>>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>>>>>we now have 1.9 in AS
>>>>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:59:45 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/23/15, 10:03 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, it's cool, it simplified my life as well as being able to modify
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>html head from AS, for example here with the dynamic loading of the
>>>>>>jQuery lib but it seems I'm the only one happy with that :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No interests to add such feature to the framework though ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
>>>>> automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
>>>>> org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in the
>>>>> script being added to the head.
>>>>>
>>>>> This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or
>>>>>wrong.
>>>>> Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
>>>>> encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to guess
>>>>> up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
