On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> So, now, I guess those Core/js classes have been generated but how ?
> what's the process ?
>
>
What are you talking about? As far as I know all the Core/js were and
written and need to be back ported to AS now. anything in an out directory
was generated.
Mike
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:21:46 +0100
> >
> > Ok, sorry, I got it !!
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
> we now have 1.9 in AS
> >> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:03:17 +0100
> >>
> >>> Try the -keep-asdoc flag on MXMLJSC.
> >>
> >> Actually, it is what I did, I tried to compile the asjs project Core/as
> to js hoping to get the same result than what I can see in Core/js
> >>
> >> What it doesn't compiler the same ?
> >>
> >> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >>> From: aha...@adobe.com
> >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
> we now have 1.9 in AS
> >>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:53:56 +0000
> >>>
> >>> Try the -keep-asdoc flag on MXMLJSC. But the deal is that none of these
> >>> .as or .js files factor into the final app since they are all externs
> so
> >>> <inject_html> won’t be seen.
> >>>
> >>> So yes, folks can use conditional compile to add stuff, but requiring a
> >>> base class may be easier for the developers. Anyway, we’ll find out
> when
> >>> more people use it.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 6/24/15, 10:12 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
> >>>>> automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
> >>>>> org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in
> the
> >>>>> script being added to the head.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or
> >>>>>wrong.
> >>>>> Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
> >>>>> encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to
> guess
> >>>>> up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>This is true it is a bit edge case, only for externs based applications
> >>>>at the moment, it could become less true if want to use conditional
> >>>>compilation for framework components too IMO and let the creator build
> it
> >>>>in one shot, in 2 shots, he could still modify the generated JS to
> >>>>include the <inject_html> though.
> >>>>
> >>>>Btw,
> >>>> I had a look at the Closure Compiler Externs Extractor [1] but the
> >>>>result of the extracted lib [2] doesn't show any type annotations, I
> >>>>guess this is normal but I wonder how those google externs like this
> one
> >>>>[3] have been built ?
> >>>>
> >>>>Another thing, why when I cross compile IStand, I don't have the
> comments
> >>>>generated like:
> >>>>
> >>>>/**
> >>>> * addBead()
> >>>> *
> >>>> * @expose
> >>>> * @param {org_apache_flex_core_IBead} bead The bead to add.
> >>>> */
> >>>>
> >>>>I've got that only:
> >>>>
> >>>>/**
> >>>> * org.apache.flex.core.IStrand
> >>>> *
> >>>> * @fileoverview
> >>>> *
> >>>> * @suppress {checkTypes}
> >>>> */
> >>>>
> >>>>goog.provide('org_apache_flex_core_IStrand');
> >>>>
> >>>>/**
> >>>> * @interface
> >>>> */
> >>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand = function() {
> >>>>};
> >>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
> >>>>};
> >>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
> >>>>function(classOrInterface) {
> >>>>};
> >>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.removeBead = function(bead) {
> >>>>};
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>/**
> >>>> * Metadata
> >>>> *
> >>>> * @type {Object.<string, Array.<Object>>}
> >>>> */
> >>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
> >>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks
> >>>>Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>
> >>>>[1] http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/Externs/
> >>>>[2] http://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.4.js
> >>>>[3]
> >>>>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/closure-compiler/master/contrib/e
> >>>>xterns/angular-1.3.js
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>----------------------------------------
> >>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
> >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
> >>>>>we now have 1.9 in AS
> >>>>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:59:45 +0000
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6/23/15, 10:03 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Yes, it's cool, it simplified my life as well as being able to modify
> >>>>>>the
> >>>>>>html head from AS, for example here with the dynamic loading of the
> >>>>>>jQuery lib but it seems I'm the only one happy with that :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>No interests to add such feature to the framework though ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
> >>>>> automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
> >>>>> org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in
> the
> >>>>> script being added to the head.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or
> >>>>>wrong.
> >>>>> Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
> >>>>> encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to
> guess
> >>>>> up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
