Absolutely! I just ran this: var svg:XML = <svg><group><rect id="1" /><rect id="2" /></group><group><rect id="3" /><rect id="4" /></group></svg>;
var rects:XMLList = svg..rect; trace(rects.toXMLString()); and got this in the console: <rect id="1"/><rect id="2"/><rect id="3"/><rect id="4”/> On Apr 12, 2016, at 12:42 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yay! That's fantastic news. > > Just curious. Will this case work? > > var svg:XML = <svg> > <group> > <rect id="1" /> > <rect id="2" /> > </group> > <group> > <rect id="3" /> > <rect id="4" /> > </group> > </svg> > > var rects:XMLList = svg..rect; > > //rects should contain all the rects in the svg, i.e. > <rect id="1"/> > <rect id="2"/> > <rect id="3"/> > <rect id="4"/> > > Thanks, > Om > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I made some great progress today. >> >> I just compared the output of some pretty whacky xml processing in Flash >> to the output using the JS XML classes and the output was pretty close! >> >> There are definitely some issues I still need to work on (besides some >> compiler issues in JIRA), but I’m really happy with it already. I expect to >> be able to try and run some production code through the compiler in the >> next week or so and see what happens. >> >> On Apr 10, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I reached a milestone today with E4X. I have the first working test >> which reads an XML literal, writes it back out to a string and writes the >> value of an attribute using E4X notation in Javascript! >>> >>> Over the next couple of weeks I expect to be fixing a lot of issues >> related to XML and the better the test-case coverage we have, the better >> the quality will be. >>> >>> I’d like to put out a call for snippets of E4X code that people are >> using in the wild so we can incorporate tests for as many use cases as we >> can get. >>> >>> If you have code snippets to contribute, please respond! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Harbs >>> >>> (P.S. There is currently a compiler issue with two of the XML methods, >> so the XML.js file needs a bit of editing before it can be used. Hopefully >> this issue will be fixed soon.) >> >>
