Awesome!

I'll post if I can remember any of my other common scenarios.

Thanks,
Om

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Absolutely!
>
> I just ran this:
> var svg:XML = <svg><group><rect id="1" /><rect id="2"
> /></group><group><rect id="3" /><rect id="4" /></group></svg>;
>
> var rects:XMLList = svg..rect;
> trace(rects.toXMLString());
>
> and got this in the console:
> <rect id="1"/><rect id="2"/><rect id="3"/><rect id="4”/>
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 12:42 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yay!  That's fantastic news.
> >
> > Just curious.  Will this case work?
> >
> > var svg:XML = <svg>
> >  <group>
> >    <rect id="1" />
> >    <rect id="2" />
> >  </group>
> >  <group>
> >    <rect id="3" />
> >    <rect id="4" />
> >  </group>
> > </svg>
> >
> > var rects:XMLList = svg..rect;
> >
> > //rects should contain all the rects in the svg, i.e.
> > <rect id="1"/>
> > <rect id="2"/>
> > <rect id="3"/>
> > <rect id="4"/>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I made some great progress today.
> >>
> >> I just compared the output of some pretty whacky xml processing in Flash
> >> to the output using the JS XML classes and the output was pretty close!
> >>
> >> There are definitely some issues I still need to work on (besides some
> >> compiler issues in JIRA), but I’m really happy with it already. I
> expect to
> >> be able to try and run some production code through the compiler in the
> >> next week or so and see what happens.
> >>
> >> On Apr 10, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I reached a milestone today with E4X. I have the first working test
> >> which reads an XML literal, writes it back out to a string and writes
> the
> >> value of an attribute using E4X notation in Javascript!
> >>>
> >>> Over the next couple of weeks I expect to be fixing a lot of issues
> >> related to XML and the better the test-case coverage we have, the better
> >> the quality will be.
> >>>
> >>> I’d like to put out a call for snippets of E4X code that people are
> >> using in the wild so we can incorporate tests for as many use cases as
> we
> >> can get.
> >>>
> >>> If you have code snippets to contribute, please respond!
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Harbs
> >>>
> >>> (P.S. There is currently a compiler issue with two of the XML methods,
> >> so the XML.js file needs a bit of editing before it can be used.
> Hopefully
> >> this issue will be fixed soon.)
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to