FYI, this now works: rects.(@id==3).@height = "100px”; Thanks Alex for fixing this!
On Apr 13, 2016, at 12:24 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Today, the following is working too: > > var svg:XML = <svg> > <group> > <rect id="1" /> > <rect id="2" /> > </group> > <group> > <rect id="3" /> > <rect id="4" /> > </group> > </svg>; > > var rects:XMLList = svg..rect; > rects[1].@width = "100px"; > //rects.(@id==3).@height = "100px"; > trace(rects.toXMLString()); > > outputs: > <rect id="1"/><rect id="2" width="100px"/><rect id="3"/><rect id="4”/> > > Once we get some more things fixed in the compiler, we can uncomment the > second to last line, and it’ll output: > <rect id="1"/><rect id="2" width="100px"/><rect id="3" height="100px"/><rect > id="4”/> > > On Apr 12, 2016, at 12:56 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Awesome! >> >> I'll post if I can remember any of my other common scenarios. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Absolutely! >>> >>> I just ran this: >>> var svg:XML = <svg><group><rect id="1" /><rect id="2" >>> /></group><group><rect id="3" /><rect id="4" /></group></svg>; >>> >>> var rects:XMLList = svg..rect; >>> trace(rects.toXMLString()); >>> >>> and got this in the console: >>> <rect id="1"/><rect id="2"/><rect id="3"/><rect id="4”/> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 12, 2016, at 12:42 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yay! That's fantastic news. >>>> >>>> Just curious. Will this case work? >>>> >>>> var svg:XML = <svg> >>>> <group> >>>> <rect id="1" /> >>>> <rect id="2" /> >>>> </group> >>>> <group> >>>> <rect id="3" /> >>>> <rect id="4" /> >>>> </group> >>>> </svg> >>>> >>>> var rects:XMLList = svg..rect; >>>> >>>> //rects should contain all the rects in the svg, i.e. >>>> <rect id="1"/> >>>> <rect id="2"/> >>>> <rect id="3"/> >>>> <rect id="4"/> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I made some great progress today. >>>>> >>>>> I just compared the output of some pretty whacky xml processing in Flash >>>>> to the output using the JS XML classes and the output was pretty close! >>>>> >>>>> There are definitely some issues I still need to work on (besides some >>>>> compiler issues in JIRA), but I’m really happy with it already. I >>> expect to >>>>> be able to try and run some production code through the compiler in the >>>>> next week or so and see what happens. >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 10, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I reached a milestone today with E4X. I have the first working test >>>>> which reads an XML literal, writes it back out to a string and writes >>> the >>>>> value of an attribute using E4X notation in Javascript! >>>>>> >>>>>> Over the next couple of weeks I expect to be fixing a lot of issues >>>>> related to XML and the better the test-case coverage we have, the better >>>>> the quality will be. >>>>>> >>>>>> I’d like to put out a call for snippets of E4X code that people are >>>>> using in the wild so we can incorporate tests for as many use cases as >>> we >>>>> can get. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have code snippets to contribute, please respond! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Harbs >>>>>> >>>>>> (P.S. There is currently a compiler issue with two of the XML methods, >>>>> so the XML.js file needs a bit of editing before it can be used. >>> Hopefully >>>>> this issue will be fixed soon.) >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >
