So would this be a workable solution?
This:
for each(item in object){
item.doSomething();
}
Would become:
if (!!object.forEach){
object.forEach(function(item){
item.doSomething();
});
} else {
var foreachiter0_target = object;
for (var foreachiter0 in foreachiter0_target)
{
var item = foreachiter0_target[foreachiter0];
item.doSomething();
}
}
I could add a forEach method to XMLList objects and then we would not need to
do compile time checks for XML. (at least for cases of for each)
On May 8, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> wrote:
> The array forEach() seems like an acceptable alternative. Looking at MDN
> [1], forEach is widely supported in browsers. Including IE 9.
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/forEach
>
> - Josh
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM, lizhi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 10x slow.
>> maybe use the arr.forEach.
>> pls run this code
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/matrix3d/a9765b94ade3d626ad64d16f28deccae
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-foreach-very-slow-tp52571p52880.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
