Isn't tan issue with Array.forEach() that you can't use 'break' to stop
the loop?
-Alex
On 5/8/16, 3:41 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>So would this be a workable solution?
>
>This:
>
>for each(item in object){
> item.doSomething();
>}
>
>Would become:
>
>if (!!object.forEach){
> object.forEach(function(item){
> item.doSomething();
> });
>} else {
> var foreachiter0_target = object;
> for (var foreachiter0 in foreachiter0_target)
> {
> var item = foreachiter0_target[foreachiter0];
> item.doSomething();
> }
>}
>
>I could add a forEach method to XMLList objects and then we would not
>need to do compile time checks for XML. (at least for cases of for each)
>
>On May 8, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The array forEach() seems like an acceptable alternative. Looking at MDN
>> [1], forEach is widely supported in browsers. Including IE 9.
>>
>>
>>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_
>>Objects/Array/forEach
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM, lizhi <s...@qq.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 10x slow.
>>> maybe use the arr.forEach.
>>> pls run this code
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/matrix3d/a9765b94ade3d626ad64d16f28deccae
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>
>>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-foreach-very
>>>-slow-tp52571p52880.html
>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>>>Nabble.com.
>>>
>
