Rats. Good point…
On May 9, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Isn't tan issue with Array.forEach() that you can't use 'break' to stop
> the loop?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/8/16, 3:41 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So would this be a workable solution?
>>
>> This:
>>
>> for each(item in object){
>> item.doSomething();
>> }
>>
>> Would become:
>>
>> if (!!object.forEach){
>> object.forEach(function(item){
>> item.doSomething();
>> });
>> } else {
>> var foreachiter0_target = object;
>> for (var foreachiter0 in foreachiter0_target)
>> {
>> var item = foreachiter0_target[foreachiter0];
>> item.doSomething();
>> }
>> }
>>
>> I could add a forEach method to XMLList objects and then we would not
>> need to do compile time checks for XML. (at least for cases of for each)
>>
>> On May 8, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The array forEach() seems like an acceptable alternative. Looking at MDN
>>> [1], forEach is widely supported in browsers. Including IE 9.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_
>>> Objects/Array/forEach
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM, lizhi <s...@qq.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 10x slow.
>>>> maybe use the arr.forEach.
>>>> pls run this code
>>>>
>>>> https://gist.github.com/matrix3d/a9765b94ade3d626ad64d16f28deccae
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
>>>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-foreach-very
>>>> -slow-tp52571p52880.html
>>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>
>
