Hi, > I don't think there is a problem. Let's push npm out so we can push out > the announcement. If there is a problem it can be rectified.
I was suggesting that care be taken. You yourself stated that the npm release contained code from the nightly. [1] > This is another example of why the board and mentors recommend that folks who > want > to be sticklers about policy should be watching the commit lists and > raising issues early, not at the last minute where it delays the work of > the folks who are actually contributing code to the release. No it is not. If you referencing to the FlexJS release I did report issues before the RC was made. For instance [2] there are also earlier emails. > "minor" policy issues should be investigated and presented in more detail > and in a collaborative fashion I am acting in a collaborative fashion and providing detail were needed, Where there is an issue I suggest a way to fix it, for instance replacing content of dubious IP [3] with one of known licensing or with licensing issues.[2]. > instead of accusing other PMC members. On evidence in this public list it seem to me that the only person making unfounded accusations is you and I regard this as a person attack. Please apologise for your statements. Justin 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a496e2b6595fcf303b13af962f641bec42bf20687f2de07b0df63483@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E 2. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/95ba7d9eb5a83cfa8411b933d00ba6fde4c8b982feecc823e7fdbdc4@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E 3. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/92901b973714c6a12853aa8ed2972cabb529dfcff065b870e22dbb0a@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E
