It's impossible for us to put the real version number for FlexJS in the <version> element because Flash Builder thinks 0.8.0 is not a valid version for a Flex SDK. We're basically tricking Flash Builder into thinking our SDK is Flex 4. Adobe no longer updates Flash Builder, so we can't convince them to add a special case for FlexJS. With that in mind, simply think of the <version> element as a placeholder field that you should ignore as a user. The real version is included in the <name> element.
I had to do the same thing with the Feathers SDK: https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/feathers-sdk/blob/v3.1.1/flex-sdk-description.xml#L24 Just one of the things we need to deal with building a modern ActionScript SDK while people are still using older tools. - Josh On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:33 PM, sankar <santanu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > But for proper information purpose if Flex SDK releases comes with > appropriate *version* value in flex-sdk-description, doesn't FlexJS SDKs > also suppose to come with modified versioning figures (except 4.14.1 > everytime)? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/How-Apache-manages-FlexJS- > version-in-flex-sdk-description-tp56851p56858.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
