Hi, > Actually I will have definitely looked through this early on, but I'd have to > say it is quite 'light' on what PAYG actually means beyond the general sense > that I had.
I’d go further as say the definition as it is stated there seem to be perhaps too wide? > But I can see that the newly created 'DRY' discussion thread is actually > creating the type of content that I think I would have found really helpful > in terms of linking a guiding concept to one of its key implementation areas. +1 to that > If there's that level of clarity and, ultimately, agreement in terms of > definitions and approaches, I expect there will be far less need for threads > like this one. Al +1 to that. We can also point new people to it rather than trying to explain the concept(s) again saving everyone time. Thanks, Justin
