Justin, Do you now have sufficient info on the PAYG paradigm to resolve this issue?
When you re-read Alex and Harbs' suggestions now, does it make sense? I suggest we fix this issue and move on, please. Thanks, Om On Jun 6, 2017 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: Hi, > Actually I will have definitely looked through this early on, but I'd have to say it is quite 'light' on what PAYG actually means beyond the general sense that I had. I’d go further as say the definition as it is stated there seem to be perhaps too wide? > But I can see that the newly created 'DRY' discussion thread is actually creating the type of content that I think I would have found really helpful in terms of linking a guiding concept to one of its key implementation areas. +1 to that > If there's that level of clarity and, ultimately, agreement in terms of definitions and approaches, I expect there will be far less need for threads like this one. Al +1 to that. We can also point new people to it rather than trying to explain the concept(s) again saving everyone time. Thanks, Justin
