On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> HI, > > > "It can't be done in a subclass with > > an override of the strand setter? > > Probably not without altering the original bead which may also be not PAYG. > That wont be breaking PAYG. The basic idea is to avoid loading/running unnecessary code during runtime. Altering a class support subclassing should be fine. We are in what some would call an 'analysis paralysis' state. Looks like there is consensus on the subclassing route. Let's go with that and solve subsequent problems as they arise. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > Justin >
