Hi Carlos. > On Sep 12, 2017, at 5:39 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > wrote: > > Hi, just see this now, but I responded in the other thread. copying > response: > > Regarding name, I would prefer a name change since the suffix "JS" is not > reflecting the real potential of this project. If we want to output JS > exclusively, I think it would be ok. > > In the other hand, "Flex" name has very bad press in IT and companies. If > you put the word "Flex", you can have many problems with your work and > credibility with the people you talk.
Do you have examples of Apache Flex or FlexJS getting bad press? It would make your argument more persuasive. > > In the other hand, we should look at our competitors : Angular, React, Vue, > Dart,... it's all marketing: the name, the website, if we don't play well > our cards, don't expect to have a widely used technology You mean like Beads, Bend or Strands? > > In the other hand I can live with old "FlexJS" name, if people does not > want a change, but these means to me that FlexJS will hardly get considered > in the mainstream. > > Just my 2 More than that ;-) Regards, Dave > > thanks > > Carlos > > > > 2017-09-12 10:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> I personally do not see a need for a new name. >> >> To me it’s more about branding the name. If FlexJS has its own identity >> and Flash is barely mentioned I don’t think it’s dragging along the Flash >> associations. For those familiar with Flex and wanting to migrate to JS, >> the FlexJS name is a positive thing. >> >> Harbs >> >>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 4:01 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi - >>> >>> In discussions on the Board and Private list about the proposal voted on >> a few weeks ago to fork FlexJS it was pointed out that it would good to >> discuss if a new name should be attached to the forked project. >>> >>> There are one or two propositions to discuss. >>> >>> (1) FlexJS - is this distinct enough and will the historical connection >> to Adobe/Apache Flex and Flash help or hinder the forked project’s future? >>> >>> Please provide arguments in any direction. >>> >>> (2) If a change is the outcome then we need to discuss and accumulate >> reasonable names. Determine what is suitable by checking for other uses of >> these names. If there are multiple choices available then we should vote. >>> >>> A discussion of possible names can go in parallel to the discussion >> about keeping FlexJS. >>> >>> This discussion needs to proceed quickly if we want to have an open >> process in advance of the next ASF Board meeting. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >> >> > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.avant2.es > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
