I mentioned STeVe but after reading this [1][2], I withdraw that suggestion as I think STV is intended for choosing multiple from multiple instead of one of multiple. (I did not read all of [2]).
My takeaway is that, unless a true majority results, the results of other system can be challenged. So, pick a system. Harb's proposal is fine. Start a vote and hope a true majority shows up. My 2 cents, -Alex [1] https://plus.maths.org/content/which-voting-system-best [2] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/voting-methods/ On 9/16/17, 3:32 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >To me it seems like overkill for our needs, but if someone wants to try >and make it work I have no objection. > >Harbs > >> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:45 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >><bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Someone up thread mentioned that Apache STeVe could be used for this. >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsteve.ap >>ache.org%2Fvote_types.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C207aa8a7a82943b48d8b08d4fd52 >>d28c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636411979543044718&sdat >>a=IW5fRDPE2k01ktSYi1pY72Fdl%2BHjxvFSE9bFBBfPXoY%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Sep 16, 2017 1:22 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> Hi Harbs, >> >> Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options. >> >> Piotr >> >> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me. >>> >>> Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned. >>> >>> I personally like Limber/Limbre. >>> >>> I like Boinga in a different way. >>> >>> I think that Böja has a great ring to it. >>> >>> One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick >>>up to >>> three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and >> option >>> 3 for 1. >>> >>> We could then tally up the points for the winners. >>> >>> At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call >>> another vote to decide between the two with the most points. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> Harbs >>> >>>> On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we >>> might >>>> need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other >>>> suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second >>>> candidate? I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name. >>>> >>>> If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to >>> this >>>> post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe >>>>or >>>> not. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>> Muppirala" >>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting >>>>>>vote >>>>>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his >>> own >>>>>> name idea and others can give him +1. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider. We >>>>> should >>>>> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another >>> thread. >>>>> All this feels a bit rushed, I am having a bit of a hard time >> following >>>>> discussions/decisions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Om >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Piotr >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone >>>>>> who >>>>>>> would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex >>>>>>>world. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path >>>>>> where >>>>>>> first target will be ports the old one applications. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company >>>>>> as an >>>>>>> Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently >> they >>>>>>> change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone >>>>>> from >>>>>>> initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite >>>>>> there >>>>>>> were very good press out there in the company as in outside in >> Cracow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such >>>>>>>tremendous >>>>>>> opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This >> is >>>>>> what >>>>>>> we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS >>>>>>>for >>>>>> the >>>>>>> port, cause it provides me what I need. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target >>>>>> called >>>>>>>>> "Dover". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you testing the non-native speakers? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>>>>> I. >>>>>> >>> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&dat >>>a >>>>>> >>> >>>=02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c >>>1 >>>>>> >>> >>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643&sdata=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHf >>>u >>>>>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >
