Understand. The vote should be open for the next 4 hours, but I will
probably wait till tomorrow morning around 6-7 AM UTC with summary, so we
can change our VOTES eventually.

With provided information my choose will be Arise - sounds nice same as
Royale.

2017-09-19 21:12 GMT+02:00 Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> I'm inclined to favor "Braid" over Limber (however you want to spell it)
> because I can think of too many puns associated with Limber and the first
> thing that comes to mind, for me, is cheese that smells.
>
> I don't remember how to pronounce "Borja" and while English always seems
> to dominate, English-speaks will most likely pronounce it Boar-JA and a
> few will go with Boar-YA or Boar-HA. So there will probably always be a
> need for correction.
>
> While "Apache Royale" has a nice ring to it for me, I think "Braid" has
> the right feel. You get things intertwined for a purpose, things in a
> pattern, strands woven together, that sort of thing.
>
> "Braid" also brings to mind "Helix". I haven't looked to see if there are
> any projects that use "Helix" which I'm sure there are. And if so, maybe
> "Felix" to give a nod back to Flex along with the helix.
>
> —peter
>
>
>
> On 9/19/17, 2:59 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> >I am not an expert, but AIUI, trademarks are intended to avoid confusion
> >in a marketplace.  There are lots of products named Flex, such as cars,
> >diabetes testing kits, and more.  There are even other software products
> >called Flex and we need to consider whether it confuses potential
> >customers about what Flex is being talked about.
> >
> >Mostly, we will use the term "Apache <ProjectName>" instead of just
> ><ProjectName> when publishing things, but later in those documents we'll
> >probably just refer to it as <ProjectName>.
> >
> >So, IMO, having other projects on GitHub called Braids isn't a deal killer
> >and your link [1] probably won't cause confusion.  I was more concerned
> >about the Braids project related to Tensor-flow as Tensor-flow might
> >become the new hot thing in software in general and if that Braids took
> >off lots of mentions of Braids would be about that.  There is also a
> >Braids "static staging compiler" for TypeScript.
> >
> >That's why I'm concerned about Royale when there is a GitHub project
> >called Royale that is a "A React-esque framework for Javascript".  Think
> >of it this way.  If you did a search on GitHub for our project name and
> >didn't realize we were associated with Apache, would you click on one of
> >these other project instead, and how long would it take you to realize it
> >wasn't the right one?  If you go try to sell writing an app in Royale and
> >a competitor has proposed writing it in React with the other GitHub
> >Royale, will that be confusing to your client?
> >
> >I wrote to trademarks@ to see if they are similarly concerned.  They
> don't
> >always respond right away.  If they are not concerned, I will probably
> >vote for Royale just so we have a name for tomorrow.
> >
> >HTH,
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 9/19/17, 11:43 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I checked Braid on github and found [1]. It was quite popular - can we
> >>just
> >>grab that name - I still do not understand fully those trademarks
> >>implications.
> >>
> >>[1]
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>o
> >>m%2Fcristibalan%2Fbraid&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5ebf232812004352ad0108d4ff8e
> 4f1
> >>7
> >>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636414434060882785&sdata=A6
> >>I
> >>IL4SNYWP2XFTvOife92gA1t8Km4E%2Fr7QpvQ3B3mI%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>2017-09-19 20:38 GMT+02:00 Kessler CTR Mark J
> >><mark.kessler....@usmc.mil>:
> >>
> >>> Apache Bob...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 2:20 PM
> >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork
> >>>
> >>> Ick…
> >>>
> >>> Why do these things have to be so complicated? ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Harbs
> >>>
> >>> > On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:58 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
> >>>wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > There are any number of meanings for boja in many languages with and
> >>> without diacritics.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fen.m.wi
> >>>k
> >>>tionary.org%2Fwiki%2Fboja&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C5ebf232812004352ad0108d4ff8e
> >>>4
> >>>f17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636414434060882785&sdat
> >>>a
> >>>=IObJoB2mvH3y8iHRBlUvDSDBXiTXitc2FPR1tPHKQ1o%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >
> >>> > Sent from my iPhone
> >>> >
> >>> >> On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I can think of three ways* to pronounce "bo-ja" without even
> >>>resorting
> >>> to a
> >>> >> South African "click" language. This makes it a challenge to refer
> >>>to
> >>> the
> >>> >> product to anyone who does not already use it.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> *bodja, booya, boha.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Om,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> No offend :) That is why it is so hard to choose ;) I think "bo-ja"
> >>>is
> >>> the
> >>> >>> closes to how I pronounce it. :)
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Piotr
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> 2017-09-19 19:31 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Boja is one name I really dislike.  Sorry Piotr😕
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Also I dont know how to pronounce it. Is it Bo-ha, or boo-ha or
> >>>bo-ja,
> >>> >>> etc?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Sep 19, 2017 10:09 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
> >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> Reading Alex in VOTE thread and how many times we are mentioning
> >>>Boja
> >>> >>> - I
> >>> >>>>> will change my VOTE. Limbr is a bit dangerous having Dave's
> >>>finding.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Piotr
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> 2017-09-19 18:41 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> FWIW, I think Limbr is another good spelling.
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 7:34 PM, Alex Harui
> >>><aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> We don't have time for another vote thread.  We need to close
> >>>down
> >>> >>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>> vote tonight or early tomorrow morning.  So, if you are ok with
> >>> >>>> Limber
> >>> >>>>>>> (still not clear it will win, please state objections to using
> >>> >>> Limbyr
> >>> >>>>> as
> >>> >>>>>>> the spelling.  It is true a unique spelling stand out from
> >>>search
> >>> >>>>>> results,
> >>> >>>>>>> but first, you have to remember how to spell it, and my spell
> >>> >>> checker
> >>> >>>>> is
> >>> >>>>>>> constantly changing.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> On 9/19/17, 5:05 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <
> >>> >>> mark.kessler....@usmc.mil
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> If limber wins, a simple discussion thread should resolve
> >>>letter
> >>> >>>>> changes
> >>> >>>>>>>> to the name.
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> -Mark K
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> >>>>>>>> From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:52 AM
> >>> >>>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>> >>>>>>>> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS
> >>>Fork
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> It has advantage of having the name which do not exist on
> >>>github.
> >>> >>>> Let
> >>> >>>>>> say
> >>> >>>>>>>> that Limber with win in the voting - We probably have to open
> >>> >>>> another
> >>> >>>>>> VOTE
> >>> >>>>>>>> to have "Limbyr" - Which I like personally.
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Is it enough that PMCs agreed here with changing Limber to
> >>>Limbyr
> >>> >>>>> here ?
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Piotr
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
> >>> >>>>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> LinkedIn:
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.link
> >>>e
> >>>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5ebf232812004352ad0108d4ff8e
> 4f
> >>>1
> >>>7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636414434060882785&sdata=
> >>>X
> >>>nzDov8knSVIq4xA3PwxgeWYX6V%2Bhu0unihcgNTwLA8%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >>>>>
> >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.lin
> >>>k
> >>>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%
> 7C01%7C%7C5ebf2328120043
> >>>5
> >>>2ad0108d4ff8e4f17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414434
> >>>0
> >>>60882785&sdata=yFrI2bSLhV70ap8F70z%2BJ1Jr5WeG%2Bb0Wb9WPJi8JZuc%
> 3D&reserv
> >>>e
> >>>d=0>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> --
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>> >>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> LinkedIn:
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.link
> >>>e
> >>>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5ebf232812004352ad0108d4ff8e
> 4f
> >>>1
> >>>7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636414434060882785&sdata=
> >>>X
> >>>nzDov8knSVIq4xA3PwxgeWYX6V%2Bhu0unihcgNTwLA8%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >>>
> >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.lin
> >>>k
> >>>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%
> 7C01%7C%7C5ebf2328120043
> >>>5
> >>>2ad0108d4ff8e4f17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414434
> >>>0
> >>>61039038&sdata=K4zUhZQ2OUR05E0tVkElvvyrq0rOn7
> LDP4djYkGzfDo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
> >>>4
> >>>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5ebf232812004352ad0108d4ff8e
> 4f17%7Cfa
> >>>7
> >>>b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414434061039038&
> sdata=vLmMCIr
> >>>N
> >>>DxlysOX9wp0qMidTZ9UXR%2BrgNdG5cFMqa6g%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>
> >>Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >>mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>skype: zarzycki10
> >>
> >>LinkedIn:
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>d
> >>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5ebf232812004352ad0108d4ff8e
> 4f17
> >>%
> >>7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636414434061039038&sdata=9%2
> >>B
> >>h1gjQgJF%2BlQpIWnPzWzsDGh%2F2AyxfmYIxGKrl9g9w%3D&reserved=0
> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>e
> >>din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%
> 7C01%7C%7C5ebf232812004352
> >>a
> >>d0108d4ff8e4f17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414434061
> >>0
> >>39038&sdata=K4zUhZQ2OUR05E0tVkElvvyrq0rOn7LDP4djYkGzfDo%3D&reserved=0>
> >
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>

Reply via email to