Hi Haohui, I agree that we should fix the parallelism issue. Otherwise, the 1.2.1 release would introduce a new bug.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > We recently found out that all jobs submitted via UI will have a > parallelism of 1, potentially due to FLINK-5808. > > Filed FLINK-6209 to track it. > > ~Haohui > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > If possible I would like to include FLINK-6183 & FLINK-6184 as well. > > > > They fix 2 metric-related issues that could arise when a Task is > > cancelled very early. (like, right away) > > > > FLINK-6183 fixes a memory leak where the TaskMetricGroup was never closed > > FLINK-6184 fixes a NullPointerExceptions in the buffer metrics > > > > PR here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3611 > > > > On 26.03.2017 12:35, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > I opened a PR for FLINK-6188: https://github.com/apache/ > flink/pull/3616 > > <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616> > > > > > > This improves the previously very sparse test coverage for > > timestamp/watermark assigners and fixes the bug. > > > > > >> On 25 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> I agree with Aljoscha. > > >> > > >> -1 because of FLINK-6188 > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>> I filed this issue, which was observed by a user: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 > > >>> > > >>> I think that’s blocking for 1.2.1. > > >>> > > >>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 18:57, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> RC1 doesn't contain Stefan's backport for the Asynchronous snapshots > > >>>> for heap-based keyed state that has been merged. Should we create > RC2 > > >>>> with that fix since the voting period only starts on Monday? I think > > >>>> it would only mean rerunning the scripts on your side, right? > > >>>> > > >>>> – Ufuk > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Robert Metzger < > rmetz...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>>>> Dear Flink community, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink > > version 1.2 > > >>>>> .1. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The commit to be voted on: > > >>>>> *732e55bd* (* > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55bd > > >>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55bd>*) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Branch: > > >>>>> release-1.2.1-rc1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > >>>>> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/ > > >>>>> <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/>* > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > > D9839159: > > >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > >>>>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1116 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The vote ends on Wednesday, March 29, 2017, 3pm CET. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.2.1 > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... > > > > > > > >
