I merged the fix for FLINK-6044 to the release-1.2 and release-1.1 branch.

2017-03-31 15:02 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>:

> We should also backport the fix for FLINK-6044 to Flink 1.2.1.
>
> I'll take care of that.
>
> 2017-03-30 18:50 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 turns out to be a bit
>> more involved, see my comments on the PR:
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616.
>>
>> As I said there, maybe we should revert the commits regarding
>> parallelism/max-parallelism changes and release and then fix it later.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 23:08, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>> > I commented on FLINK-6214: I think it's working as intended, although we
>> > could fix the javadoc/doc.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 17:35, Timo Walther wrote:
>> > > A user reported that all tumbling and slinding window assigners
>> contain
>> > > a pretty obvious bug about offsets.
>> > >
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6214
>> > >
>> > > I think we should also fix this for 1.2.1. What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Timo
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Am 29/03/17 um 11:30 schrieb Robert Metzger:
>> > > > Hi Haohui,
>> > > > I agree that we should fix the parallelism issue. Otherwise, the
>> 1.2.1
>> > > > release would introduce a new bug.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> -1 (non-binding)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> We recently found out that all jobs submitted via UI will have a
>> > > >> parallelism of 1, potentially due to FLINK-5808.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Filed FLINK-6209 to track it.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ~Haohui
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM Chesnay Schepler <
>> ches...@apache.org>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> If possible I would like to include FLINK-6183 & FLINK-6184 as
>> well.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> They fix 2 metric-related issues that could arise when a Task is
>> > > >>> cancelled very early. (like, right away)
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> FLINK-6183 fixes a memory leak where the TaskMetricGroup was
>> never closed
>> > > >>> FLINK-6184 fixes a NullPointerExceptions in the buffer metrics
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> PR here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3611
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On 26.03.2017 12:35, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>> > > >>>> I opened a PR for FLINK-6188: https://github.com/apache/
>> > > >> flink/pull/3616
>> > > >>> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616>
>> > > >>>> This improves the previously very sparse test coverage for
>> > > >>> timestamp/watermark assigners and fixes the bug.
>> > > >>>>> On 25 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> I agree with Aljoscha.
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> -1 because of FLINK-6188
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> > > >> aljos...@apache.org>
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>> I filed this issue, which was observed by a user:
>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188
>> > > >>>>>> I think that’s blocking for 1.2.1.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 18:57, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> RC1 doesn't contain Stefan's backport for the Asynchronous
>> snapshots
>> > > >>>>>>> for heap-based keyed state that has been merged. Should we
>> create
>> > > >> RC2
>> > > >>>>>>> with that fix since the voting period only starts on Monday?
>> I think
>> > > >>>>>>> it would only mean rerunning the scripts on your side, right?
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> – Ufuk
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Robert Metzger <
>> > > >> rmetz...@apache.org>
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>> Dear Flink community,
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> Flink
>> > > >>> version 1.2
>> > > >>>>>>>> .1.
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on:
>> > > >>>>>>>> *732e55bd* (*
>> > > >>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55bd
>> > > >>>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55b
>> d>*)
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Branch:
>> > > >>>>>>>> release-1.2.1-rc1
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>> > > >>>>>>>> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/
>> > > >>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/>*
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with
>> fingerprint
>> > > >>> D9839159:
>> > > >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> flink-1116
>> > > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> The vote ends on Wednesday, March 29, 2017, 3pm CET.
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.2.1
>> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to