We should also backport the fix for FLINK-6044 to Flink 1.2.1.

I'll take care of that.

2017-03-30 18:50 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 turns out to be a bit
> more involved, see my comments on the PR:
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616.
>
> As I said there, maybe we should revert the commits regarding
> parallelism/max-parallelism changes and release and then fix it later.
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 23:08, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> > I commented on FLINK-6214: I think it's working as intended, although we
> > could fix the javadoc/doc.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 17:35, Timo Walther wrote:
> > > A user reported that all tumbling and slinding window assigners contain
> > > a pretty obvious bug about offsets.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6214
> > >
> > > I think we should also fix this for 1.2.1. What do you think?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Timo
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 29/03/17 um 11:30 schrieb Robert Metzger:
> > > > Hi Haohui,
> > > > I agree that we should fix the parallelism issue. Otherwise, the
> 1.2.1
> > > > release would introduce a new bug.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> We recently found out that all jobs submitted via UI will have a
> > > >> parallelism of 1, potentially due to FLINK-5808.
> > > >>
> > > >> Filed FLINK-6209 to track it.
> > > >>
> > > >> ~Haohui
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM Chesnay Schepler <
> ches...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> If possible I would like to include FLINK-6183 & FLINK-6184 as
> well.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> They fix 2 metric-related issues that could arise when a Task is
> > > >>> cancelled very early. (like, right away)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> FLINK-6183 fixes a memory leak where the TaskMetricGroup was never
> closed
> > > >>> FLINK-6184 fixes a NullPointerExceptions in the buffer metrics
> > > >>>
> > > >>> PR here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3611
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 26.03.2017 12:35, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> > > >>>> I opened a PR for FLINK-6188: https://github.com/apache/
> > > >> flink/pull/3616
> > > >>> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616>
> > > >>>> This improves the previously very sparse test coverage for
> > > >>> timestamp/watermark assigners and fixes the bug.
> > > >>>>> On 25 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I agree with Aljoscha.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> -1 because of FLINK-6188
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > > >> aljos...@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> I filed this issue, which was observed by a user:
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188
> > > >>>>>> I think that’s blocking for 1.2.1.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 18:57, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> RC1 doesn't contain Stefan's backport for the Asynchronous
> snapshots
> > > >>>>>>> for heap-based keyed state that has been merged. Should we
> create
> > > >> RC2
> > > >>>>>>> with that fix since the voting period only starts on Monday? I
> think
> > > >>>>>>> it would only mean rerunning the scripts on your side, right?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> – Ufuk
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Robert Metzger <
> > > >> rmetz...@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> Dear Flink community,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Flink
> > > >>> version 1.2
> > > >>>>>>>> .1.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on:
> > > >>>>>>>> *732e55bd* (*
> > > >>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55bd
> > > >>>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55bd
> >*)
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Branch:
> > > >>>>>>>> release-1.2.1-rc1
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > >>>>>>>> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/
> > > >>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/>*
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > >>> D9839159:
> > > >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheflink-1116
> > > >>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> The vote ends on Wednesday, March 29, 2017, 3pm CET.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.2.1
> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
> > > >>>
> > >
>

Reply via email to