@Greg: I merged that.

It seems like all blockers are now either resolved or determined not to be 
blocking for this release. I will try and cut the first RC now.

Best,
Aljoscha

> On 21. Jul 2017, at 19:07, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote:
> 
> FLINK-7211 is a trivial change for excluding the gelly examples javadoc from 
> the release assembly and would be good to have fixed for 1.3.2.
> 
> 
>> On Jul 13, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I agree that FLINK-6951 should also be a blocker for 1.3.2. I’ll update its 
>> priority.
>> 
>> On 13 July 2017 at 4:06:06 PM, Bowen Li (bowen...@offerupnow.com) wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Aljoscha,  
>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6951 fixed  
>> in 1.3.2, if it makes sense.  
>> 
>> Thanks,  
>> Bowen  
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>  
>> wrote:  
>> 
>>> Short update, we resolved some blockers and discovered some new ones.  
>>> There’s this nifty Jira page if you want to keep track:  
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12340984 <  
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12340984>  
>>> 
>>> Once again, could everyone please update the Jira issues that they think  
>>> should be release blocking. I would like to start building release  
>>> candidates at the end of this week, if possible.  
>>> 
>>> And yes, I’m volunteering to be the release manager on this release. ;-)  
>>> 
>>> Best,  
>>> Aljoscha  
>>> 
>>>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 16:03, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:  
>>>> 
>>>> I think we might have another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/  
>>> jira/browse/FLINK-7133 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7133>  
>>>> 
>>>>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 09:18, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote:  
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we are pretty close now -- Jira shows that we're down to two  
>>>>> blockers: FLINK-7069 and FLINK-6965.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> FLINK-7069 is being merged and we have a PR for FLINK-6965.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> ~Haohui  
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:44 AM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>  
>>> wrote:  
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’m seeing these remaining blockers:  
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7069?filter=  
>>> 12334772&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%  
>>> 20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved  
>>>>>> <  
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7069?filter=  
>>> 12334772&jql=project%20=%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20=%  
>>> 20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Could everyone please correctly mark as “blocking” those issues that  
>>> they  
>>>>>> consider blocking for 1.3.2 so that we get an accurate overview of  
>>> where we  
>>>>>> are.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @Chesnay, could you maybe check if this one should in fact be  
>>> considered a  
>>>>>> blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7034? <  
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7034?>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best,  
>>>>>> Aljoscha  
>>>>>>> On 6. Jul 2017, at 07:19, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>  
>>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> FLINK-7041 has been merged.  
>>>>>>> I’d also like to raise another blocker for 1.3.2:  
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6996.  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,  
>>>>>>> Gordon  
>>>>>>> On 30 June 2017 at 12:46:07 AM, Aljoscha Krettek (aljos...@apache.org  
>>> )  
>>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Gordon and I found this (in my opinion) blocking issue:  
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7041 <  
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7041>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I’m trying to quickly provide a fix.  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 26. Jun 2017, at 15:30, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I just opened a PR which should be included in the next bug fix  
>>> release  
>>>>>> for the Table API:  
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7005  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Timo  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Am 23.06.17 um 14:09 schrieb Robert Metzger:  
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Haohui.  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The first main task for the release management is to come up with a  
>>>>>>>>> timeline :)  
>>>>>>>>> Lets just wait and see which issues get reported. There are  
>>> currently  
>>>>>> no  
>>>>>>>>> blockers set for 1.3.1 in JIRA.  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com>  
>>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Release management is though, I'm happy to help. Are there any  
>>>>>> timelines  
>>>>>>>>>> you have in mind?  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Haohui  
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:01 AM Robert Metzger <  
>>> rmetz...@apache.org>  
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,  
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> with the 1.3.1 release on the way, we can start thinking about the  
>>>>>> 1.3.2  
>>>>>>>>>>> release.  
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> We have already one issue that should go in there:  
>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6964  
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If there are any other blockers, let us know here :)  
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering if there's somebody from the community who's  
>>> willing to  
>>>>>>>>>> take  
>>>>>>>>>>> care of the release management of 1.3.2 :)  
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to