I think we don't have to consider that since no-one (aside from testing) ever ran into problems with that. However, we should keep in mind merging this for 1.4 (and 1.3.3). What do you think?
Best, Aljoscha > On 28. Jul 2017, at 14:35, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote: > > Would https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3669 (Make StatefulSequenceSource > rescalable) be considered another blocker / important fix for 1.3.2? > > Was scanning some PRs and noticed that there were previous comments on > needing to merge that fix for release-1.3. > One specific aspect I’m not sure of whether or not to consider it a blocker > is if there are actually users using the StatefulSequenceSource in > production, and if so, we would need to do a bit more work on the source to > make it backwards compatible (as of now, the changes in the PR do not provide > backwards compatibility). > > What do you think? > > - Gordon > On 25 July 2017 at 11:02:05 PM, Aljoscha Krettek (aljos...@apache.org) wrote: > > I did some preliminary cluster testing on 1.3-SNAPSHOT and it seems there is > another issue in RocksDB with incremental checkpoints. Stefan and I are > currently investigating. I'll keep you posted and we can hopefully create an > RC once we hunt this one down. > > Best, > Aljoscha > >> On 24. Jul 2017, at 14:39, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> I just merged the fixes for FLINK-7137 and FLINK-7177. All blockers are >> resolved from the Table & SQL API side. >> >> Regards, >> Timo >> >> Am 24.07.17 um 11:14 schrieb Aljoscha Krettek: >>> @Greg: I merged that. >>> >>> It seems like all blockers are now either resolved or determined not to be >>> blocking for this release. I will try and cut the first RC now. >>> >>> Best, >>> Aljoscha >>> >>>> On 21. Jul 2017, at 19:07, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> FLINK-7211 is a trivial change for excluding the gelly examples javadoc >>>> from the release assembly and would be good to have fixed for 1.3.2. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jul 13, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I agree that FLINK-6951 should also be a blocker for 1.3.2. I’ll update >>>>> its priority. >>>>> >>>>> On 13 July 2017 at 4:06:06 PM, Bowen Li (bowen...@offerupnow.com) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Aljoscha, >>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6951 fixed >>>>> in 1.3.2, if it makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bowen >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Short update, we resolved some blockers and discovered some new ones. >>>>>> There’s this nifty Jira page if you want to keep track: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12340984 < >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12340984> >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again, could everyone please update the Jira issues that they think >>>>>> >>>>>> should be release blocking. I would like to start building release >>>>>> candidates at the end of this week, if possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> And yes, I’m volunteering to be the release manager on this release. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Aljoscha >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 16:03, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we might have another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>> jira/browse/FLINK-7133 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7133> >>>>>>>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 09:18, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think we are pretty close now -- Jira shows that we're down to two >>>>>>>> blockers: FLINK-7069 and FLINK-6965. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FLINK-7069 is being merged and we have a PR for FLINK-6965. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ~Haohui >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:44 AM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> I’m seeing these remaining blockers: >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7069?filter= >>>>>> 12334772&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND% >>>>>> >>>>>> 20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7069?filter= >>>>>> 12334772&jql=project%20=%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20=% >>>>>> 20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved >>>>>>>>> Could everyone please correctly mark as “blocking” those issues that >>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> consider blocking for 1.3.2 so that we get an accurate overview of >>>>>> where we >>>>>>>>> are. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Chesnay, could you maybe check if this one should in fact be >>>>>> considered a >>>>>>>>> blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7034? < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7034?> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Aljoscha >>>>>>>>>> On 6. Jul 2017, at 07:19, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> FLINK-7041 has been merged. >>>>>>>>>> I’d also like to raise another blocker for 1.3.2: >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6996. >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Gordon >>>>>>>>>> On 30 June 2017 at 12:46:07 AM, Aljoscha Krettek >>>>>>>>>> (aljos...@apache.org >>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Gordon and I found this (in my opinion) blocking issue: >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7041 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7041> >>>>>>>>>> I’m trying to quickly provide a fix. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 26. Jun 2017, at 15:30, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I just opened a PR which should be included in the next bug fix >>>>>> release >>>>>>>>> for the Table API: >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7005 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Timo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.06.17 um 14:09 schrieb Robert Metzger: >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Haohui. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The first main task for the release management is to come up with >>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> timeline :) >>>>>>>>>>>> Lets just wait and see which issues get reported. There are >>>>>> currently >>>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>>> blockers set for 1.3.1 in JIRA. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Release management is though, I'm happy to help. Are there any >>>>>>>>> timelines >>>>>>>>>>>>> you have in mind? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Haohui >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:01 AM Robert Metzger < >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the 1.3.1 release on the way, we can start thinking about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> 1.3.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have already one issue that should go in there: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6964 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are any other blockers, let us know here :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering if there's somebody from the community who's >>>>>> willing to >>>>>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>>>>> care of the release management of 1.3.2 :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >
