+1 (non-binding)

* Downloaded artifacts
* Verified checksums/GPG signatures
* Compared checkout with provided sources
* Verified pom file versions
* Went over NOTICE file/pom files changes without finding anything
suspicious
* Build Flink from sources
* Deployed standalone session cluster and ran WordCount example in batch
and streaming: Nothing suspicious in log files found

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:51 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - checked hashes and signatures
> - built from sources
> - started cluster, ran different simple jobs
> - checked sql client
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:14 PM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - verified signatures and hashsums
> > - built from source code succeeded
> > - checked all dependency artifacts are 1.16
> > - started a cluster, ran a wordcount job, the result is expected, no
> > suspicious log output
> > - started SQL Gateway, tested several rest APIs, the SQL query results
> are
> > expected
> >
> > Best,
> > Leonard Xu
> >
> >
> > > 2022年10月24日 下午8:49,Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > - verify signatures and checksums
> > > - no binaries found in source archive
> > > - build from source code
> > > - verify python wheel package contents
> > > - pip install apache-flink-libraries and apache-flink wheel packages
> > > - thread mode works as expected in Python DataStream API
> > > - the Python DataStream Window works as expected
> > > - the Python Sideoutput works as expected
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Xingbo
> > >
> > > Lijie Wang <wangdachui9...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月24日周一 16:09写道:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding) for this candidate
> > >>
> > >>  *   Built from the source code.
> > >>  *   Verified the signature and checksum
> > >>  *   Ran both streaming/batch jobs on yarn cluster
> > >>  *   The new speculative execution works as expected
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Lijie
> > >>
> > >> Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2022年10月22日周六 15:20写道:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>  *   build from the source code.
> > >>>  *   verified the signature of the release binaries.
> > >>>  *   launched a standalone cluster with examples for both
> > >> streaming/batch
> > >>> execution modes.
> > >>>  *   checked rocksdb's log would exist under Flink's default log
> > folder.
> > >>>  *   reviewed the flink-web PR
> > >>>
> > >>> Best
> > >>> Yun Tang
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>> From: Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 18:29
> > >>> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (binding) for this release candidate
> > >>>
> > >>> - verified checksum & signature
> > >>> - build from source
> > >>> - tried example jobs with standalone cluster, web ui & logs look good
> > >>> - the new completed jobs & history server features work as expected
> > >>> - the new hybrid shuffle mode works as expected
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>>
> > >>> Xintong
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:09 AM godfrey he <godfre...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 to make 1.16.0 released as soon as possible,
> > >>>> it's been more than two months since feature freeze,
> > >>>> 1.17 already starts kicking off. We can fix the critical bugs in
> > >> 1.16.1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Godfrey
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月21日周五 09:57写道:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> BTW, missing 1.16.0 is probably not that bad. From my experience,
> the
> > >>>> x.y.0
> > >>>>> releases are usually considered unstable and are mainly for trying
> > >> out
> > >>>>> purposes. Most users do not upgrade to the new version in
> production
> > >>>> until
> > >>>>> the x.y.1/2 releases, which are considered more stable. As this
> > >> bug-fix
> > >>>> is
> > >>>>> making 1.16.1 anyway, it barely misses anything.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Xintong
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:10 AM Danny Cranmer <
> > >> dannycran...@apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> We had a similar situation for Flink 1.15.1 where a non-regression
> > >>>>>> "critical" bug was impacting a connector [1]. We decided to not
> > >> block
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>> release to address this issue. Based on this, I am inclined to
> > >> agree
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>> Martijn and move forward with the release. This bug is not marked
> > >> as
> > >>> a
> > >>>>>> "blocker" and we should respect that.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I am happy to manage a 1.15.3 or 1.16.1 release follow up to
> > >> address
> > >>>> these
> > >>>>>> concerns.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1]
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8hxz5n6x2v4c6v8z33hdz51h1bhn768d
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Danny
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:01 PM Martijn Visser <
> > >>>> martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Taking in this fix would require us to cancel RC2 and create
> > >>> another
> > >>>>>>> release candidate. We are already long-overdue on the Flink 1.16
> > >>>> release.
> > >>>>>>> Given that 1.15.3 is not yet released, it can't be a regression
> > >>>> compared
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>> the current situation of 1.15.2. The Flink Delta connector is not
> > >>>> part of
> > >>>>>>> the ASF Flink community so it can't be considered a blocker from
> > >> a
> > >>>> ASF
> > >>>>>>> Flink community perspective.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I do understand the pain. I'm curious what others think if this
> > >> is
> > >>>> worthy
> > >>>>>>> of cancelling the release candidate.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks, Martijn
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Chmielewski <
> > >>>>>>> krzysiek.chmielew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thank you all for response,
> > >>>>>>>> however i think you may miss a bigger context regarding those 3
> > >>>>>> tickets.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Those 3 tickets [29509, 29512, 29627] are part of a bigger
> > >> thing.
> > >>>> They
> > >>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>> fixing 1.15 Sink V2 issue, where Task manager will not start
> > >>> after
> > >>>>>>> recovery
> > >>>>>>>> for Sink topology with Global Committer. The problem was
> > >>> described
> > >>>> by
> > >>>>>> me
> > >>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>> this thread [1]. We need all three to fix the problem.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> All three tickets were merged into 1.15 release branch and will
> > >>> be
> > >>>>>>> included
> > >>>>>>>> in 1.15.3 probably, however 1.16 will be missing one fix
> > >> (29627).
> > >>>>>>>> In other words, there will be a regression between 1.16 and
> > >>> 1.15.3.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Additionally for now this issue is blocking Flink migration for
> > >>>> Delta
> > >>>>>>>> connector [2].
> > >>>>>>>> We need to migrate because Flink 1.14 has another Sink problem
> > >>> with
> > >>>>>> data
> > >>>>>>>> loss during Sink Recovery with Global Committer [3] and this
> > >> one
> > >>>> most
> > >>>>>>>> likely will not be fixed since 1.14 support is ending.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Forgive my if I'm wrong but what do you mean by " we won't
> > >> block
> > >>>> 1.16.0
> > >>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>> this." Fix is merged so couldn't we just cherry pick 1.16 merge
> > >>>> commit
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>> 1.16.0's RC2?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/otscy199g1l9t3llvo8s2slntyn2r1jc
> > >>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/delta-io/connectors/tree/master/flink
> > >>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29589
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Krzysztof Chmielewski
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> czw., 20 paź 2022 o 16:13 Xingbo Huang <h...@apache.org>
> > >>>> napisał(a):
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> When I was building rc2, I tried to search whether issues
> > >> with
> > >>>> `fix
> > >>>>>>>>> version` of 1.16.0 have not been closed.
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627 was missed
> > >>>> because
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> `fix version` was not marked. I agree with Martijn and
> > >> Xintong
> > >>>> that
> > >>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>> won't block 1.16.0 on this.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Xingbo
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月20日周四 18:23写道:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> FLINK-29627 is merged after rc2 being created, that's why
> > >> it
> > >>>>>> doesn't
> > >>>>>>>>> appear
> > >>>>>>>>>> in the change list. See the commit history of rc2 [1].
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> It's unfortunate this fix didn't make the 1.16.0 release
> > >> (if
> > >>>> rc2 is
> > >>>>>>>>>> approved). However, I agree with Martijn that we should not
> > >>>> further
> > >>>>>>>> block
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.16.0 on this. If there's no other blockers discovered in
> > >>> the
> > >>>> rc2,
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> fix
> > >>>>>>>>>> of FLINK-29627 will be shipped in 1.16.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Xintong
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commits/release-1.16.0-rc2
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 6:16 PM Krzysztof Chmielewski <
> > >>>>>>>>>> krzysiek.chmielew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks  Martijn,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> just to clarify from my end,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> All three tickets,  [1] [2] [3] are fixed and merged to
> > >>> 1.16
> > >>>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>>>>>> already. I just noticed that one of them [3] is not on
> > >>>> included
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>> change list. Hence my email.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29509
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29512
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Krzysztof Chmielewski
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> czw., 20 paź 2022 o 11:51 Martijn Visser <
> > >>>>>> martijnvis...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Given that this issue already exists in previous Flink
> > >>>>>> versions,
> > >>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>> don't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> think it's a blocker for 1.16. We should get it fixed
> > >>> (all
> > >>>> of
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>> tickets)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> so it will be addressed in a new Flink 1.15 version, in
> > >>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>> 1.16.1
> > >>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> course Flink 1.17.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:47 AM Krzysztof Chmielewski
> > >> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> krzysiek.chmielew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to ask about [1] ticket with PR [2]. It
> > >>> was
> > >>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.16
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch today but I do not see it on the
> > >> change
> > >>>> list.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is closely related to [3] and [4] that are on the
> > >>>> change
> > >>>>>>> list.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> However
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to fully fix Sink architecture issue we need all 3
> > >>>> tickets
> > >>>>>> [1],
> > >>>>>>>> [3]
> > >>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21115
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29509
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29512
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Krzysztof Chmielewski
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 20 paź 2022 o 11:21 Xingbo Huang <
> > >> h...@apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2
> > >>> for
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> version
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.16.0,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > >>>> specific
> > >>>>>>>>>> comments)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your
> > >>> review,
> > >>>>>> which
> > >>>>>>>>>>> includes:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> > >>>> convenience
> > >>>>>>>>>> releases
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed
> > >>>> with the
> > >>>>>>> key
> > >>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint 3C2C9FFB59DF9F3E [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > >>>>>>> Repository
> > >>>>>>>>> [4],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.16.0-rc2" [5],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and
> > >>>> adding
> > >>>>>>>>>>> announcement
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> blog
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
> > >>>> adopted
> > >>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>> majority
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chesnay, Martijn, Godfrey & Xingbo
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12351275
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.16.0-rc2
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1541
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.16.0-rc2
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/574
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>

Reply via email to