+1 (binding)

Best Regards,
Yu


On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:53, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> > 2023年3月2日 05:03,Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Gyula
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:57 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Thomas
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 6:53 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for driving this Danny.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Samrat Deb <decordea...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (non binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for driving it
> >>>>
> >>>> Bests,
> >>>> Samrat
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 1:36 PM, Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Danny for driving it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Junrui
> >>>>>
> >>>>> yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年2月28日周二 14:04写道:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Danny for driving it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>> Yuxia
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> >>>>>> 发件人: "Weihua Hu" <huweihua....@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> >>>>>> 发送时间: 星期二, 2023年 2 月 28日 下午 12:48:09
> >>>>>> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Flink minor version support policy for old releases
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks, Danny.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Weihua
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:38 PM weijie guo <
> >>> guoweijieres...@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks Danny for bring this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Weijie
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年2月27日周一 20:23写道:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> BTW, should we follow the content style [1] to describe the new
> >>>> rule
> >>>>>>> using
> >>>>>>>> 1.2.x, 1.1.y, 1.1.z?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>> https://flink.apache.org/downloads/#update-policy-for-old-releases
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>> Jing
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 1:06 PM Matthias Pohl
> >>>>>>>> <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, Danny. Sounds good to me.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:11 AM Danny Cranmer <
> >>>>>>> dannycran...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I am starting a vote to update the "Update Policy for old
> >>>>> releases"
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> include additional bugfix support for end of life versions.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> As per the discussion thread [2], the change we are voting
> >> on
> >>>> is:
> >>>>>>>>>> - Support policy: updated to include: "Upon release of a
> >> new
> >>>>> Flink
> >>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>> version, the community will perform one final bugfix
> >> release
> >>>> for
> >>>>>>>> resolved
> >>>>>>>>>> critical/blocker issues in the Flink minor version losing
> >>>>> support."
> >>>>>>>>>> - Release process: add a step to start the discussion
> >> thread
> >>>> for
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> final
> >>>>>>>>>> patch version, if there are resolved critical/blocking
> >> issues
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>> flush.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Voting schema: since our bylaws [3] do not cover this
> >>>> particular
> >>>>>>>>> scenario,
> >>>>>>>>>> and releases require PMC involvement, we will use a
> >> consensus
> >>>>> vote
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>> PMC
> >>>>>>>>>> binding votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Danny
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html#update-policy-for-old-releases
> >>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/szq23kr3rlkm80rw7k9n95js5vqpsnbv
> >>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Sergey
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to