+1 (non-binding) Thanks for driving this Danny.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Samrat Deb <decordea...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks for driving it > > Bests, > Samrat > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 1:36 PM, Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Danny for driving it. > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best regards, > > Junrui > > > > yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年2月28日周二 14:04写道： > > > > > Thanks Danny for driving it. > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Yuxia > > > > > > ----- 原始邮件 ----- > > > 发件人: "Weihua Hu" <huweihua....@gmail.com> > > > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org> > > > 发送时间: 星期二, 2023年 2 月 28日 下午 12:48:09 > > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Flink minor version support policy for old releases > > > > > > Thanks, Danny. > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Weihua > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:38 PM weijie guo <guoweijieres...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Danny for bring this. > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Weijie > > > > > > > > > > > > Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年2月27日周一 20:23写道： > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > BTW, should we follow the content style [1] to describe the new > rule > > > > using > > > > > 1.2.x, 1.1.y, 1.1.z? > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://flink.apache.org/downloads/#update-policy-for-old-releases > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Jing > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 1:06 PM Matthias Pohl > > > > > <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Danny. Sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:11 AM Danny Cranmer < > > > > dannycran...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am starting a vote to update the "Update Policy for old > > releases" > > > > [1] > > > > > > to > > > > > > > include additional bugfix support for end of life versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per the discussion thread [2], the change we are voting on > is: > > > > > > > - Support policy: updated to include: "Upon release of a new > > Flink > > > > > minor > > > > > > > version, the community will perform one final bugfix release > for > > > > > resolved > > > > > > > critical/blocker issues in the Flink minor version losing > > support." > > > > > > > - Release process: add a step to start the discussion thread > for > > > the > > > > > > final > > > > > > > patch version, if there are resolved critical/blocking issues > to > > > > flush. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Voting schema: since our bylaws [3] do not cover this > particular > > > > > > scenario, > > > > > > > and releases require PMC involvement, we will use a consensus > > vote > > > > with > > > > > > PMC > > > > > > > binding votes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html#update-policy-for-old-releases > > > > > > > [2] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/szq23kr3rlkm80rw7k9n95js5vqpsnbv > > > > > > > [3] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Sergey
