Hi everyone,

This vote thread is now closed. We have reached a consensus with 6
binding votes, 8 non-binding votes and no vetoes, I will follow up and
apply the changes.

+1s
- Matthias
- Jing
- Weijie
- Weihua
- Yuxia
- Junrui
- Samrat
- Sergey
- Thomas (binding)
- Gyula (binding)
- Jark (binding)
- Yu (binding)
- Jingsong (binding)
- Danny (binding)

Thanks,
Danny

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 8:06 AM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 1:30 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:53, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > > 2023年3月2日 05:03,Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Gyula
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:57 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Thomas
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 6:53 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <
> snuyan...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks for driving this Danny.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Samrat Deb <decordea...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1 (non binding)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks for driving it
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Bests,
> > > >>>> Samrat
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 1:36 PM, Junrui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks Danny for driving it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>> Junrui
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年2月28日周二 14:04写道:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks Danny for driving it.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>> Yuxia
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> > > >>>>>> 发件人: "Weihua Hu" <huweihua....@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>> 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > > >>>>>> 发送时间: 星期二, 2023年 2 月 28日 下午 12:48:09
> > > >>>>>> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Flink minor version support policy for old
> releases
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks, Danny.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>> Weihua
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:38 PM weijie guo <
> > > >>> guoweijieres...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks Danny for bring this.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Weijie
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年2月27日周一 20:23写道:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> BTW, should we follow the content style [1] to describe the
> new
> > > >>>> rule
> > > >>>>>>> using
> > > >>>>>>>> 1.2.x, 1.1.y, 1.1.z?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>
> https://flink.apache.org/downloads/#update-policy-for-old-releases
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>>>> Jing
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 1:06 PM Matthias Pohl
> > > >>>>>>>> <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, Danny. Sounds good to me.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:11 AM Danny Cranmer <
> > > >>>>>>> dannycran...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I am starting a vote to update the "Update Policy for old
> > > >>>>> releases"
> > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> include additional bugfix support for end of life versions.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> As per the discussion thread [2], the change we are voting
> > > >> on
> > > >>>> is:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - Support policy: updated to include: "Upon release of a
> > > >> new
> > > >>>>> Flink
> > > >>>>>>>> minor
> > > >>>>>>>>>> version, the community will perform one final bugfix
> > > >> release
> > > >>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>> resolved
> > > >>>>>>>>>> critical/blocker issues in the Flink minor version losing
> > > >>>>> support."
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - Release process: add a step to start the discussion
> > > >> thread
> > > >>>> for
> > > >>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>> final
> > > >>>>>>>>>> patch version, if there are resolved critical/blocking
> > > >> issues
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>>>>> flush.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Voting schema: since our bylaws [3] do not cover this
> > > >>>> particular
> > > >>>>>>>>> scenario,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> and releases require PMC involvement, we will use a
> > > >> consensus
> > > >>>>> vote
> > > >>>>>>> with
> > > >>>>>>>>> PMC
> > > >>>>>>>>>> binding votes.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Danny
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>
> https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html#update-policy-for-old-releases
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > > >>>>>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/szq23kr3rlkm80rw7k9n95js5vqpsnbv
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Best regards,
> > > >>> Sergey
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to