+1 (binding)

Thanks for the awesome proposal! I believe this is gonna be a huge move
towards Flink for AI.

Best,
Qingsheng

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 9:41 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Swapnal,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Haven't discussed this with the others yet, but A2A is at least on my list.
> But I haven't thought about it in detail enough to answer your questions.
>
> Our plan is to first work on a MVP version that shows the unique advantages
> and differentiators of  Flink Agents compared to other agent frameworks,
> and a production-ready version with full functionalities would be the next
> step. From my perspective, A2A probably belongs to the second phase, thus
> we haven't started any concrete design or plan around it at the moment.
>
> Best,
>
> Xintong
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 3:12 AM Swapnal Varma <swapnal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Sounds exciting!
> >
> > I went through the FLIP and it mentions support for MCP (for tools) and
> > kafka as a storage engine for inter agent interaction support.
> > These are great for enterprise adoption, standardization, and
> > interoperability!
> >
> > In similar vein, I wanted to get the community's thoughts on support for
> > Google's A2A protocol for agent to agent communication [1]. Backed by
> > Google and 50+ of it's corporate partners [2], I see A2A gaining
> widespread
> > adoption, although gradually.
> >
> > I think it presents some good ideas.
> > 1. Is it within the scope of the proposed Flink agents project to add
> > support for A2A? Or my understanding of the project's aims is flawed and
> > this should be dealt with elsewhere?
> > 2. If support is to be added, should it be baked into the Flink agents'
> > Agent / AgentRuntime classes for out of the box support, or as a special
> > subclass?
> > 3. Alternatively Flink agents could choose to remain un-opinionated on
> this
> > while allowing the extensibility to let users define their own A2A
> > compliant flink agents workflows?
> > 4. Or any other ideas if I'm way off the mark here?
> >
> > Just figured I'd put it out there and get thoughts on this while we're
> > still in the design phase on Flink Agents.
> >
> > The A2A specification can be found here:
> > https://google-a2a.github.io/A2A/specification/
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/google-a2a/A2A
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://developers.googleblog.com/en/a2a-a-new-era-of-agent-interoperability/
> >
> > Thanks for the work on this!
> >
> > Best,
> > Swapnal
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Jun 2025, 07:01 Xintong Song, <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-531: Initiate Flink Agents as a new
> > > Sub-Project [1], which has been discussed in this thread [2].
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Xintong
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-531%3A+Initiate+Flink+Agents+as+a+new+Sub-Project
> > >
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/p9m7wvtlw7sc2oh7v0jk3hb60x5x53yy
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to