I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan provided a fix for a crucial bug here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/91. I'm going to test his changes and see if it fixes the error I reported. Also, we need to disable the POJO serialization, as it seems broken right now.
There is one additional issue I would like to discuss here: With this release candidate, I've named the artifacts "apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2-src.tgz", my first RC had just "flink-0.6-incubating..", without the "apache-" prefix. Different Apache projects handle this differently, I prefer to include the "apache" name into the files. Our name is short enough to do that and it has a positive branding effect. What do you think? On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Flink 0.6 > incubating. This will be the first release for Flink since entering the > Apache Incubator. > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=c8585689 > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2/ > > The GPG key used to sign the release are available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/flink/KEYS > > A staged Maven repository is available for review at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1001 > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.6 incubating. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of > at least three +1 PPMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.6-incubating > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > >
