I am not aware of any requirement that the jar have apache in the name.
Alan.
Ufuk Celebi <mailto:[email protected]>
August 8, 2014 at 1:39 AM
I've changed my opinion.
I thought about this further and think we should stick to the version
*without* the prefix. The legal team asked for a release without the
Apache prefix and most of the other projects don't do it either.
Do any of the mentors have input on this?
Ufuk Celebi <mailto:[email protected]>
August 8, 2014 at 12:38 AM
On 08 Aug 2014, at 09:36, Robert Metzger<[email protected]> wrote:
I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan provided a
fix for a crucial bug here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/91. I'm going to test his
changes and see if it fixes the error I reported.
I will also review the PR.
Also, we need to disable the POJO serialization, as it seems broken right
now.
+1
There is one additional issue I would like to discuss here: With this
release candidate, I've named the artifacts
"apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2-src.tgz", my first RC had just
"flink-0.6-incubating..", without the "apache-" prefix.
Different Apache projects handle this differently, I prefer to include the
"apache" name into the files. Our name is short enough to do that and it
has a positive branding effect.
What do you think?
+1
Robert Metzger <mailto:[email protected]>
August 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM
I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan
provided a
fix for a crucial bug here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/91. I'm going to test his
changes and see if it fixes the error I reported.
Also, we need to disable the POJO serialization, as it seems broken right
now.
There is one additional issue I would like to discuss here: With this
release candidate, I've named the artifacts
"apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2-src.tgz", my first RC had just
"flink-0.6-incubating..", without the "apache-" prefix.
Different Apache projects handle this differently, I prefer to include the
"apache" name into the files. Our name is short enough to do that and it
has a positive branding effect.
What do you think?
Robert Metzger <mailto:[email protected]>
August 7, 2014 at 9:27 AM
Hi All,
Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Flink 0.6
incubating. This will be the first release for Flink since entering the
Apache Incubator.
The tag to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=c8585689
The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2/
The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/flink/KEYS
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1001
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.6 incubating.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
at least three +1 PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.6-incubating
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
--
Sent with Postbox <http://www.getpostbox.com>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
