Hi Robert,

No need for prefix IMHO, makes the names shorter and always assume
Flink releases will be under ASF

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we should create another release candidate since Stephan provided a
> fix for a crucial bug here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/91. I'm going to test his
> changes and see if it fixes the error I reported.
> Also, we need to disable the POJO serialization, as it seems broken right
> now.
>
> There is one additional issue I would like to discuss here: With this
> release candidate, I've named the artifacts
> "apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2-src.tgz", my first RC had just
> "flink-0.6-incubating..", without the "apache-" prefix.
>
> Different Apache projects handle this differently, I prefer to include the
> "apache" name into the files. Our name is short enough to do that and it
> has a positive branding effect.
> What do you think?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Flink 0.6
>> incubating. This will be the first release for Flink since entering the
>> Apache Incubator.
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=c8585689
>>
>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/apache-flink-0.6-incubating-rc2/
>>
>> The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/flink/KEYS
>>
>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1001
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.6 incubating.
>>
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>> at least three +1 PPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.6-incubating
>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to