It would require users to move to 2.11 as well. So this might not be such a good move right now, but that is why I'm asking here.
Cheers, Aljoscha On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: > What does this mean from a user perspective? I'm not sure whether most > companies are already moving to Scala 2.11. I know from one large company > that is only conducting the move from 2.9 to 2.10 right now. > > Best, > Sebastian > > > On 08/23/2014 05:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > >> +1 >> Am 23.08.2014 17:16 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi, >>> what do you guys thing about bumping to 2.11.x. Scala 2.10.x has a nasty >>> bug that has been biting me in the arse for years. Now that I'm trying to >>> bring the Scala API up to feature parity with the Java API I'm again >>> wrestling with the bug. (Something to do with type checking, which keeps >>> me >>> from using an elegant solution using implicits. I can elaborate if you >>> want.) >>> >>> This would require some changes in the existing Scala code but they >>> should >>> be minor. Also, Scala is still a young and fast-moving language, so >>> people >>> should be used to bumping Scala versions often. By the way, 2.11.0 is >>> from >>> April 2014 and they had to minor releases since, so we are up to 2.11.2 >>> now. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Aljoscha >>> >>> >> >
