Nice to hear Aljoscha. :) BTW Is there a issue for the stuff you are doing? I think it would be great for future maintainers to have a small description of the problems you have encountered thus far ;-)
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I think we should stick with 2.10 then for the time being. I found > another way to implement it and the Scala API will be very lean once I'm > done, so it shouldn't be to hard to move to 2.11 once we have to. > > Aljoscha > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Sebastian Schelter < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > Going to 2.11 also restricts user to libraries that already have a 2.11 > > version available. Just my 2 cents. > > > > -sebastian > > Am 24.08.2014 11:31 schrieb "Till Rohrmann" <[email protected]>: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > My £0.02 -- yes it's an incompatible change, and I think you should > > > > move to 2.11 sooner than later. It will get harder as time goes on > and > > > > eventually you'll have to maintain some 2.xx support after moving > > > > ahead for some existing users. You have a load more latitude in > > > > incubation. Move fast / break things -- for now. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > It would require users to move to 2.11 as well. So this might not > be > > > > such a > > > > > good move right now, but that is why I'm asking here. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Sebastian Schelter < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> What does this mean from a user perspective? I'm not sure whether > > most > > > > >> companies are already moving to Scala 2.11. I know from one large > > > > company > > > > >> that is only conducting the move from 2.9 to 2.10 right now. > > > > >> > > > > >> Best, > > > > >> Sebastian > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On 08/23/2014 05:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 > > > > >>> Am 23.08.2014 17:16 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" < > > > [email protected] > > > > >: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > >>>> what do you guys thing about bumping to 2.11.x. Scala 2.10.x > has a > > > > nasty > > > > >>>> bug that has been biting me in the arse for years. Now that I'm > > > > trying to > > > > >>>> bring the Scala API up to feature parity with the Java API I'm > > again > > > > >>>> wrestling with the bug. (Something to do with type checking, > which > > > > keeps > > > > >>>> me > > > > >>>> from using an elegant solution using implicits. I can elaborate > if > > > you > > > > >>>> want.) > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> This would require some changes in the existing Scala code but > > they > > > > >>>> should > > > > >>>> be minor. Also, Scala is still a young and fast-moving language, > > so > > > > >>>> people > > > > >>>> should be used to bumping Scala versions often. By the way, > 2.11.0 > > > is > > > > >>>> from > > > > >>>> April 2014 and they had to minor releases since, so we are up to > > > > 2.11.2 > > > > >>>> now. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> What do you think? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Cheers, > > > > >>>> Aljoscha > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
