+1
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > My £0.02 -- yes it's an incompatible change, and I think you should > move to 2.11 sooner than later. It will get harder as time goes on and > eventually you'll have to maintain some 2.xx support after moving > ahead for some existing users. You have a load more latitude in > incubation. Move fast / break things -- for now. > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It would require users to move to 2.11 as well. So this might not be > such a > > good move right now, but that is why I'm asking here. > > > > Cheers, > > Aljoscha > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> What does this mean from a user perspective? I'm not sure whether most > >> companies are already moving to Scala 2.11. I know from one large > company > >> that is only conducting the move from 2.9 to 2.10 right now. > >> > >> Best, > >> Sebastian > >> > >> > >> On 08/23/2014 05:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> Am 23.08.2014 17:16 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <[email protected] > >: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>>> what do you guys thing about bumping to 2.11.x. Scala 2.10.x has a > nasty > >>>> bug that has been biting me in the arse for years. Now that I'm > trying to > >>>> bring the Scala API up to feature parity with the Java API I'm again > >>>> wrestling with the bug. (Something to do with type checking, which > keeps > >>>> me > >>>> from using an elegant solution using implicits. I can elaborate if you > >>>> want.) > >>>> > >>>> This would require some changes in the existing Scala code but they > >>>> should > >>>> be minor. Also, Scala is still a young and fast-moving language, so > >>>> people > >>>> should be used to bumping Scala versions often. By the way, 2.11.0 is > >>>> from > >>>> April 2014 and they had to minor releases since, so we are up to > 2.11.2 > >>>> now. > >>>> > >>>> What do you think? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Aljoscha > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> >
