-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10379/#review18997
-----------------------------------------------------------



flume-ng-sinks/flume-ng-elasticsearch-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/elasticsearch/ElasticSearchSink.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10379/#comment39478>

    I think you should 
    
    1. Add a null check for the event headers before attempting to retrieve the 
timestamp header.
    
    2. Provide a strategy for still returning an index using the current time 
in cases where no valid timestamp header in present in the event.


- Israel Ekpo


On April 9, 2013, 5:59 p.m., Edward Sargisson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10379/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 9, 2013, 5:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume and Hari Shreedharan.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This change gets the timestamp from the event and uses it (in UTC) to 
> determine the name of the index to write to. This is required to match the 
> behaviour of Logstash so that Kibana can find the log events.
> The previous code would use the current time and would do it in the timezone 
> of the Flume agent's host.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug FLUME-1782.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1782
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   flume-ng-doc/sphinx/FlumeUserGuide.rst 693c0d7 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-ng-elasticsearch-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/elasticsearch/ElasticSearchSink.java
>  1b3db14 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-ng-elasticsearch-sink/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/sink/elasticsearch/TestElasticSearchSink.java
>  94b95b1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10379/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All unit tests and integration tests pass. A snapshot using commit 
> 5b9d31f1ad228 and the patch for flume-1972 has passed our internal 
> integration tests using customisations.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Edward Sargisson
> 
>

Reply via email to