Looks ok at first glance. IMO, it could use some more substance as to
how we got into this situation in the first place (IPMC/Board are not
Java/Maven experts and likely don't know what a parent pom is -- see
Justin's confusion over a release with no code). The fact that the
parent pom is necessary to make a release of fluo (core) and the recipes
would be good to clarify. Show a bit more of the big picture, where
things are going.
I think including a link to Christopher's plan of action would be
prudent (to show thought put into this)
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b478645815bf7b1fee8342a21924162decc173d91c22eaf5f708a435@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E
Will give more feedback as I think some more.
- Josh
Keith Turner wrote:
I took an initial pass at the report. If anyone wants to make further
edits, feel free.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote:
Wow. Things really blew up while I was offline.
I would strongly recommend summarizing what happened with the parent-pom
release thread in this report.
Keith Turner wrote:
I am going to work on the podling report today.
