I updated the report
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks ok at first glance. IMO, it could use some more substance as to how we > got into this situation in the first place (IPMC/Board are not Java/Maven > experts and likely don't know what a parent pom is -- see Justin's confusion > over a release with no code). The fact that the parent pom is necessary to > make a release of fluo (core) and the recipes would be good to clarify. Show > a bit more of the big picture, where things are going. > > I think including a link to Christopher's plan of action would be prudent > (to show thought put into this) > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b478645815bf7b1fee8342a21924162decc173d91c22eaf5f708a435@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E > > Will give more feedback as I think some more. > > - Josh > > > Keith Turner wrote: >> >> I took an initial pass at the report. If anyone wants to make further >> edits, feel free. >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016 >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Wow. Things really blew up while I was offline. >>> >>> I would strongly recommend summarizing what happened with the parent-pom >>> release thread in this report. >>> >>> >>> Keith Turner wrote: >>>> >>>> I am going to work on the podling report today.
