Looks good to me. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> I updated the report > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks ok at first glance. IMO, it could use some more substance as to > how we > > got into this situation in the first place (IPMC/Board are not Java/Maven > > experts and likely don't know what a parent pom is -- see Justin's > confusion > > over a release with no code). The fact that the parent pom is necessary > to > > make a release of fluo (core) and the recipes would be good to clarify. > Show > > a bit more of the big picture, where things are going. > > > > I think including a link to Christopher's plan of action would be prudent > > (to show thought put into this) > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b478645815bf7b1fee8342a21924162decc173d91c22eaf5f708a435@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E > > > > Will give more feedback as I think some more. > > > > - Josh > > > > > > Keith Turner wrote: > >> > >> I took an initial pass at the report. If anyone wants to make further > >> edits, feel free. > >> > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016 > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Wow. Things really blew up while I was offline. > >>> > >>> I would strongly recommend summarizing what happened with the > parent-pom > >>> release thread in this report. > >>> > >>> > >>> Keith Turner wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I am going to work on the podling report today. >
