Yes! +1 On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:17 AM Mike Walch <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1. I think Fluo is ready to start the graduation process. > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:49 AM Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think it would be in Fluo's best interests to start the graduation > > > process. We've added one new committer, and have had several successful > > > releases. I think it's clear that the PPMC understands what is required > > of > > > them from the Foundation and is prepared to meet those requirements. > > > > > > While I would still be more comfortable with more committers coming on > > > board, I don't think this is a blocker for graduation. Given the niche > > > nature of Fluo, it is going to be hard to attract new committers no > > matter > > > what stage we are in (incubation or TLP). I don't think this is > > reflective > > > of its ability to survive as a TLP. What matters is that we understand > > how > > > to add new committers when they do come and there isn't much left to > > learn > > > from incubation. > > > > > > What does the rest of the PPMC think about applying for graduation? > > > > +1 > > > > I was looking over the following > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > > > > We need to update our status file > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/fluo.html > > >
