On 6/28/17 12:16 PM, Christopher wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/26/17 6:27 PM, Christopher wrote:
I think it would be in Fluo's best interests to start the graduation
process. We've added one new committer, and have had several successful
releases. I think it's clear that the PPMC understands what is required
of
them from the Foundation and is prepared to meet those requirements.
While I would still be more comfortable with more committers coming on
board, I don't think this is a blocker for graduation. Given the niche
nature of Fluo, it is going to be hard to attract new committers no
matter
what stage we are in (incubation or TLP). I don't think this is
reflective
of its ability to survive as a TLP. What matters is that we understand
how
to add new committers when they do come and there isn't much left to
learn
from incubation.
What does the rest of the PPMC think about applying for graduation?
Can't argue with that logic. I'd say Fluo is more like niche on top of
niche. I don't recall seeing any chatter on general@incubator on the
subject of "expected community size" nor have I looked through
graduations that define how many committers are added.
Anyways, I'm hesitant on graduation given the small, close-knit
community, but have no concern with those members running a successful TLP.
I share the concern on the small close-knit community, and I think that's
something we'd have to keep working on as a TLP, and a line item to be
covered in our regular board reports as a TLP. I just don't see incubation
as helping with that any time soon.
Well put.
