On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/26/17 6:27 PM, Christopher wrote: > > I think it would be in Fluo's best interests to start the graduation > > process. We've added one new committer, and have had several successful > > releases. I think it's clear that the PPMC understands what is required > of > > them from the Foundation and is prepared to meet those requirements. > > > > While I would still be more comfortable with more committers coming on > > board, I don't think this is a blocker for graduation. Given the niche > > nature of Fluo, it is going to be hard to attract new committers no > matter > > what stage we are in (incubation or TLP). I don't think this is > reflective > > of its ability to survive as a TLP. What matters is that we understand > how > > to add new committers when they do come and there isn't much left to > learn > > from incubation. > > > > What does the rest of the PPMC think about applying for graduation? > > Can't argue with that logic. I'd say Fluo is more like niche on top of > niche. I don't recall seeing any chatter on general@incubator on the > subject of "expected community size" nor have I looked through > graduations that define how many committers are added. > > Anyways, I'm hesitant on graduation given the small, close-knit > community, but have no concern with those members running a successful TLP. > I share the concern on the small close-knit community, and I think that's something we'd have to keep working on as a TLP, and a line item to be covered in our regular board reports as a TLP. I just don't see incubation as helping with that any time soon.
