On Thursday 04 August 2005 3:04 pm, Ross Gardler wrote: > How do you avoid name conflicts given that Forrest does not have a > monopoly on plugin publication? > > That is what if I call a plugin foo and Joe calls his plugin foo and > then Forrest creates one called foo?
Hmm, I guess that does create a problem. Can we atleast allow users to specify a user-defined map that binds canonical plugin names with simple names? In any case, I'd like to play around with this idea personally. Can someone please point the right direction... what would be the neatest way of implementing something like this? Diwaker -- Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net
pgpZu6I9bI1JF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
