On 25/05/2010, at 03:15, Tim Williams wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Thorsten Scherler <thors...@apache.org> > wrote: >> >> On 27/04/2010, at 08:04, David Crossley wrote: >> >>> Tim Williams wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, if the dispatcher is all that changed in such a release, we >>>> could do a 0.91 afterwards. I think there's another consideration >>>> that I didn't mention too. I feel irresponsible releasing software >>>> that we can't support and I'm concerned that this would be the case >>>> with the dispatcher. I have a difficult enough time now digging up >>>> Cocoon knowledge when questions come across but with >>>> dispatcher-related ones I have no clue. Maybe it's an unfounded >>>> concern, I dunno... >>> >>> I have the same concerns. >>> >>> Perhaps we should get 0.9 released ASAP, >>> then make a concerted effort to build a Dispatcher >>> community. Make another release soon after. >> >> >> I understand what you are all saying, but the dispatcher is basically one >> transformer and >> the usage of locationmap for resolving the structurer and contracts. There >> is not much >> more to it. > > So, would you be against a 0.9 release with dispatcher in the > whiteboard? Does anyone have the time in the near future to move it > from the whiteboard anyway?
I am not sure about the community support as reason to keep it in the whiteboard. There are many devs and committer that uses the dispatcher so I do not see the missing community around it. salu2 Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>
