On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Cyriaque Dupoirieux <cyriaque.dupoiri...@pco-innovation.com> wrote: > le 22/04/2010 12:24 Ross Gardler a écrit : >> On 22/04/2010 00:54, Tim Williams wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Tim Williams<william...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:38 PM, David Crossley<cross...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Tim Williams wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> reason I ask, is that we have FOR-1198 and FOR-796 both as "blockers" >>>>>> >>>>> No such issue. Rather FOR-1108 and FOR-796. >>>>> >>>> Arghh, typo, Thanks David. So, are we leaving dispatcher in the >>>> whiteboard for now? >>>> >>> Hate to be a nag, but... are we leaving dispatcher in the whiteboard >>> for the 0.9 release? It's complicated b/c we have [at least] two >>> things working at odds here: 1) dispatcher has come to be in popular >>> use despite its status and 2) being in the whiteboard, it wouldn't >>> make it in the actual release. >>> >>> So, thoughts? >>> >> I've wanted dispatcher in core since the 0.8 release for this very reason. >> >> However, now I'm only an observer here I'll refrain from arguing for or >> against, just settle with pointing out that I think it would be a >> mistake to leave it out of 0.9 unless it were to delay the release >> unreasonably (ahem). >> >> If it doesn't go in I would want to see a 0.10 within months with >> dispatcher in. >> > I agree with you Ross, > I think forrest needs a new release to make it clear that forrest is not > dead... > But we should also think about a R0.10 planned ASAP.
Well, if the dispatcher is all that changed in such a release, we could do a 0.91 afterwards. I think there's another consideration that I didn't mention too. I feel irresponsible releasing software that we can't support and I'm concerned that this would be the case with the dispatcher. I have a difficult enough time now digging up Cocoon knowledge when questions come across but with dispatcher-related ones I have no clue. Maybe it's an unfounded concern, I dunno... --tim
