le 22/04/2010 12:24 Ross Gardler a écrit : > On 22/04/2010 00:54, Tim Williams wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Tim Williams<william...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:38 PM, David Crossley<cross...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Tim Williams wrote: >>>> >>>>> reason I ask, is that we have FOR-1198 and FOR-796 both as "blockers" >>>>> >>>> No such issue. Rather FOR-1108 and FOR-796. >>>> >>> Arghh, typo, Thanks David. So, are we leaving dispatcher in the >>> whiteboard for now? >>> >> Hate to be a nag, but... are we leaving dispatcher in the whiteboard >> for the 0.9 release? It's complicated b/c we have [at least] two >> things working at odds here: 1) dispatcher has come to be in popular >> use despite its status and 2) being in the whiteboard, it wouldn't >> make it in the actual release. >> >> So, thoughts? >> > I've wanted dispatcher in core since the 0.8 release for this very reason. > > However, now I'm only an observer here I'll refrain from arguing for or > against, just settle with pointing out that I think it would be a > mistake to leave it out of 0.9 unless it were to delay the release > unreasonably (ahem). > > If it doesn't go in I would want to see a 0.10 within months with > dispatcher in. > I agree with you Ross, I think forrest needs a new release to make it clear that forrest is not dead... But we should also think about a R0.10 planned ASAP. (We discussed this one or two years ago and decided at this time that it should be great to be able to plan new releases every 3 or four months...)
Saluations, Cyriaque, > Ross > >
