On 10/17/06, Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because that's not my goal? Is there something wrong with it?
absolutally nothing wrong :-)
but i thought it would be easier to remain with an uno package and only
working on integration instead of splitting it in sources
i'm obviously totally wrong
I see your point, but the decision to break out of being a UNO package
was made a long time ago, and the reason was the need to use OO.o's
internal string translation API. This was not availabe to UNO package
back then, and still isn't today (I know there is one in the works,
but I can't afford to wait for that).
Right now, my goal is to integrate it and get it to work. We can work
out the implementation details after that, perhaps.
Kohei
P.S. I'm still struggling through the infamous spec-writing process...
So, I'm a little behind my own internal schedule... ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
