Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On 10/17/06, Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Because that's not my goal? Is there something wrong with it? >> >> absolutally nothing wrong :-) >> >> but i thought it would be easier to remain with an uno package and only >> working on integration instead of splitting it in sources >> i'm obviously totally wrong > > I see your point, but the decision to break out of being a UNO package > was made a long time ago, and the reason was the need to use OO.o's > internal string translation API. This was not availabe to UNO package > back then, and still isn't today (I know there is one in the works, > but I can't afford to wait for that).
>From what I understood I also assumed that you are using some calc C++ classes. Correct? Or are you using only the UNO API? Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
