I'm fine with it, and thanks for working on this.

However, one important question wasn't yet answered. Who of the
mentors want to be in the PMC after graduation? So far we only have
Sergio Fernández. (And as of non-mentors, me, also Evangelia said that
he plans to remain.)

Also, I plant to create a document about making releases and about the
project specific development policy. I would put that under the
"Community" category on freemarker.org. Do you think that can increase
our changes? (The best would be if someone else makes the next release
based on that, but certainly we won't wait that much with the
graduation attempt.)


Thursday, June 30, 2016, 6:18:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> I have spent some time reading the graduation guidelines, specifically [*].
>
> Here I am quoting the preparation steps before graduation:
> Preparations
>
>    - Complete (and sign off) tasks documented in the status file
>    <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status>
>    - Ensure suitable names
>    <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-names> for
>    project name and product names
>    - Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases
>    <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases>
>    - Demonstrate community readiness
>    <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community>
>    - Ensure Mentors
>   
> <http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor>
>     and IPMC
>   
> <http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29>
> have
>    no remaining issues
>    <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-issues>
>
>
> The first two items (status page update and suitable names search) are in
> progress.
> Demonstrate ability to create releases is already done.
> Demonstrate community readiness is done with the only concern about the
> ability to attract new committers and nominate new PMC members: this is our
> weak point, not diversity and openess.
> The last point, is performed with two votes: an internal vote in this list
> to make sure that the FreeMarker PMC and the community are happy about
> requesting the graduation; the second vote will happen in the general list
> to make sure that the IPMC is happy to recommend to the ASF Board the
> graduation (for this vote we will also prepare the resolution for
> graduation).
>
> I would say that before we start the community vote we should complete the
> first two items (status page updates and suitable names search) that are
> currently in progress: after that I will start a vote thread in this list
> and if successful we will prepare a charter and start a vote/discussion on
> the general list.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo
>
> References:
>
> [*] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Since there was a date there, I assume it the name checked, even if
>> > informally. But, I have opened an issue for it now:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-107
>> >
>> > And thanks for the status page commit!
>> >
>> >
>> > Monday, June 27, 2016, 8:52:26 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> >
>> > > After you I went though the podling status page gather some
>> > > concrete dates from what I found in my inbox, jira, etc.
>> > >
>> > > Actually there is a talks:
>> > >
>> > >   Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist.
>> > >   Please follow the guide to ensure a suitable project/product name.
>> > >
>> > > that I can find traces at trademarks jira:
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH
>> > >
>> > > Have we checked by any other mean?
>> > >
>> > > I know Freemarker is a well-established brand since 14 years; but I
>> > > guess I'd go though the process just to have the formal ok from legal.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 7:21 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:01 PM Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I'm asking this primarily from mentors:
>> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html
>> > >>
>> > >> There are two thins to note:
>> > >>
>> > >> - "Add all active committers in the STATUS file."
>> > >>   What STATUS file?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > The file at content/projects/freemarker.xml which renders as
>> > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> - For many things I have just added a year instead of year-month-day.
>> > >>   I hope nobody will care.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Yep, IPMC will care.
>> > > You'll want to list out all of your reports - if you can include
>> 04/2016
>> > as
>> > > well.
>> > > Many of the dates you have for 07/2015 should be the day you entered
>> > > incubation, which is 2015-07-01
>> > >
>> > > Your name search should be a link to the podlingnamesearch JIRA for
>> > > freemarker, I can't find one for the project, so I would recommend that
>> > you
>> > > create one.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >>  Daniel Dekany
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> >  Daniel Dekany
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergio Fernández
>> Partner Technology Manager
>> Redlink GmbH
>> m: +43 6602747925
>> e: [email protected]
>> w: http://redlink.co
>>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Reply via email to