How do you mean this to be combined with "Discuss the project's
graduation on the general list"?


Thursday, June 30, 2016, 10:02:34 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:

> Although I agree the wording could be a bit more positive, I think it's
> important to keep the first point from Daniel
>
> What about something like "Reach a bigger community that will contribute to
> the project"?
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> the report looks good to me, thank you.
>> Maybe we could rephrase the following section:
>>
>> =============================
>> Most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>
>>   1. Find more active contributors, discuss how to proceed without that
>>   2. Fill blanks left on the status page
>> =============================
>>
>> into this one:
>>
>> =============================
>> Most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>
>>   1. Make sure that the project's status page is updated
>>   2. Discuss the project's graduation on the general list
>>
>> =============================
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Here's what I intend to submit. Because we want to mention the
>> > graduation discussion, I thought it's better if you look at it first:
>> >
>> >
>> > FreeMarker
>> >
>> > FreeMarker is a template engine, i.e. a generic tool to generate text
>> > output
>> > based on templates. FreeMarker is implemented in Java as a class library
>> > for
>> > programmers.
>> >
>> > FreeMarker has been incubating since 2015-07-01. The FreeMarker project
>> > exists and produces releases since around 2001.
>> >
>> > Most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>> >
>> >   1. Find more active contributors, discuss how to proceed without that
>> >   2. Fill blanks left on the status page
>> >
>> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>> > aware of?
>> >
>> >   None
>> >
>> > How has the community developed since the last report?
>> >
>> >   There were no changes
>> >
>> > How has the project developed since the last report?
>> >
>> >   The project has made a new public release, which come with new
>> features,
>> > bug fixes,
>> >   and documentation improvements. Discussion was started about the
>> > possibility of
>> >   graduation. Some missing information on the status page was filled, and
>> > a formal
>> >   "podling name search" was started.
>> >
>> > Date of last release:
>> >
>> >   2016-06-26
>> >
>> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>> >
>> >   2015-10-21 Nan Lei, committer (non-PMC)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> >  Daniel Dekany
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Reply via email to