+1 for incubator-freemarker-online-tester Am 25.02.2017 11:10 vorm. schrieb "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]>:
Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote: > I'd probably add something (like tester) as just -online doesn't seem to > say what it is. So then how about incubator-freemarker-online-tester? (I'm not afraid of long names... :) ) > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I will request a Git repo for the evaluator service. Then I will ask >> Kenshoo to submit an ICLA, and make a pull request on that repository. >> >> What should be the name of the repository? If nobody says otherwise, >> it will be incubating-freemarker-online. (See our currently existing >> repos here: http://freemarker.org/sourcecode.html) >> >> >> Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 3:32:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> > Done, good news :) >> > >> > Jacques >> > >> > >> > Le 08/02/2017 à 15:03, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >> They say the are will to donate the freemarker-online source code to >> >> ASF. Does someone want to help out with the paper work, like sending >> >> them the file to fill and sign and post, etc.? >> >> >> >> I have also posted to INFRA-13246 about this, but couldn't change the >> >> status to "wariting for infra". Jacques, do you have the right to do >> >> that? >> >> >> >> >> >> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 6:48:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> >> >>> Le 21/01/2017 à 17:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >>>>>> Nope (as far as I know)... I was hoping that INFRA-13246 will have >> >>>>>> some kind of positive feedback first, but it seems it has to be the >> >>>>>> other way around then. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Anyway, have you seen and reactions on our proposal? In case you >> have >> >>>>>> met someone face to face or something... >> >>>>> I must say I'm reluctant to push the request more w/o nothing in >> >>>>> hand, or at least nothing more to say (like we contacted them, we >> begin to work on >> >>>>> it, etc., ie some action engaged) >> >>>> OK, I will ask Kenshoo (the owner of freemarker-online) now... >> >>> Thanks I'm sure this will help >> >>> >> >>> Jacques >> >>> >> >>>>> Jacques >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 3:00:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Any news about this? Somebody contacted them? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> It would help to push INFRA-13246 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Thanks >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Jacques >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 13:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >> >>>>>>>> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if we >> can >> >>>>>>>> offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden for >> >>>>>>>> them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's >> just >> >>>>>>>> good PR. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the >> site/service: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker >> template by >> >>>>>>>>>> providing the template code and its context. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service to >> the users >> >>>>>>>>>> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a >> very useful >> >>>>>>>>>> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is an interest in this community then we could move in >> two >> >>>>>>>>>> directions: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and >> see if they >> >>>>>>>>>> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our >> community and help >> >>>>>>>>>> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then we >> could >> >>>>>>>>>> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the possibility >> to set up a >> >>>>>>>>>> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use >> to deploy a >> >>>>>>>>>> similar service, from our official website >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any >> volunteers for >> >>>>>>>>>> #2 (or even #1)? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Jacopo >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here: >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for OFBiz >> >>>>>>>>> I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this >> task. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany -- Synesty GmbH Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a 07745 Jena Tel.: +49 3641 559649 Fax.: +49 3641 5596499 Internet: http://synesty.com Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger Unternehmenssitz: Jena Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766 Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
